But seriously, in bbs my graph looks fine, like a bit below 2bbev/100, but I've always ran badly when moving up and having to regrind lower. Sure that I ran above EV at 200z, but I had 10+ shots at 100z that went wrong, which just destroyed my graph in $ but it's fine in bbs.
I'm losing at almost 3bb/100 at 100z over 130k hands, just look at how much of 50z grind is needed to cover that
But seriously, in bbs my graph looks fine, like a bit below 2bbev/100, but I've always ran badly when moving up and having to regrind lower. Sure that I ran above EV at 200z, but I had 10+ shots at 100z that went wrong, which just destroyed my graph in $ but it's fine in bbs.
I'm losing at almost 3bb/100 at 100z over 130k hands, just look at how much of 50z grind is needed to cover that
No, you're breakeven, other than your shots at 100z and 200z where you ran hot:
Shots occurred around the 800k hand mark. Before then, you were well and truly breakeven.
I peak here each now and then to see the "progress" of you because you seem like a nice guy and thread had potential.
Now though, I'm too scared to read through your HHs / moreover to read your retorts as it might burn the last remaining brain cells I have.
Dude, if you'd invest 10% of time from doing that into hard work and submission, you'd already invented an atom of an atom.
GL but please either stop to troll or
And accept that you're failing because that's the only way to move on
Last edited by Menace_2_Society; 01-15-2019 at 08:04 PM.
H3: vs unknown fish, I almost folded the river, decided to call because I thought he could do this with flushes and 22, was happy when I saw he had a flush, but chips went the wrong way lol
UTG raises to 3 BB, fold, CO raises to 9 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold
CO wins 7.5 BB
H5: vs semifish who loves to float any2 OTF IP, thought that his sizing indicated that my hand was the best a lot of the time and went for the value raise. OTR I thought it was a very good card for him since his spazzes would get TP, but I was calling because I thought the fish wouldn't valuebet Ax but would bluff a lot. OTT I was a bit afraid, but he was so loose pre and OTF that I thought it was likely he had a spazz
H8: Vs brazillian girl reg, this call is just insane, very very very bad, but I went for it because of the read I was discussing in the last posts. But that river helps her so much and it will be hard to find enough bluffs. I think another reason for calling was because I was making good calls all the time lol, which is a terrible reasoning, I snap quit the session after this. Called in the last second btw haha, insane to see how much people are overbluffing vs me, she played like a brazilian haha! vaaaaaaamo!
H9: vs semifish, I called this in the last second and internet went down, didn't know if I had called or not on stars, after thinking for a bit before the internet came back I was hoping I had timed out.
H11: Is this too thin OTR? I thought that on that texture I wouldn't get that many calls from worse given JT got there, villain has a lot of AQ and he will probably not defend a lot of Ax. It looks so nitty to check this back, meh.
I peak here each now and then to see the "progress" of you because you seem like a nice guy and thread had potential.
Now though, I'm too scared to read through your HHs / moreover to read your retorts as it might burn the last remaining brain cells I have.
Dude, if you'd invest 10% of time from doing that into hard work and submission, you'd already invented an atom of an atom.
GL but please either stop to troll or
And accept that you're failing because that's the only way to move on
Chill out a bit, bro. All my HHs look like a mess because I post only hands that are interesting to me and hands I thought I made mistakes. Every other p&g poster make mistakes, but I'm the only one who posts all of them (and I upload more frequently, which adds bad hands very quickly).
I've fixed a lot of leaks in my game and am playing way better than before, it will take a while but I feel I will finally make it. Just gotta put volume and hope for the best!
H11 you're becoming the new Welshgaz lmao. Passive & nitty, I usually swear at my screen in French when I see your type of hand at showdown.
K7hh xr turn vs 4bb
Also you say you post "mistakes/weird hands" but you do it for entertainment and not to get input, you're not asking for help, you're justifying horrible and illogical lines with horrible and illogical analysis'.
I help a 5nl pgc'er on Skype atm and I wouldn't be surprised if he outdid your lifetime profits this year. Sux..
H3. Perfect example of how you still cant even value bet properly. River should be a jam, hes calling all trips and flushes. You still cant even get it in vs a 60bb fish properly, he had to do the job for you. Deservedly punished.
H4. Scared money.
H5. Value raise with that kicker? lul. Deservedly rivered.
H6, bomb turn.
H7. Been playing so many years and still can't even do a proper raise sizing. Even play money fish have better sizings.
H8. Fold turn.
H9 fold pre.
H11. xb is not terrible vs some villians, who wont call worse ever.
H11 you're becoming the new Welshgaz lmao. Passive & nitty, I usually swear at my screen in French when I see your type of hand at showdown.
K7hh xr turn vs 4bb
Also you say you post "mistakes/weird hands" but you do it for entertainment and not to get input, you're not asking for help, you're justifying horrible and illogical lines with horrible and illogical analysis'.
I help a 5nl pgc'er on Skype atm and I wouldn't be surprised if he outdid your lifetime profits this year. Sux..
Weren't you rapids buddy like 3 pages ago? What happened?
Also you say you post "mistakes/weird hands" but you do it for entertainment and not to get input, you're not asking for help, you're justifying horrible and illogical lines with horrible and illogical analysis'.
In before 5 paragraphs of justification from Rapid when Finland doesn't even want a reply to this post and just wants Rapid to try to take advice from reasonable players.
Weren't you rapids buddy like 3 pages ago? What happened?
We're still friends, finland agrees with most of my plays and he is just trolling here lol. A lot of these new plays I learned with finland/pio haha!
Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
In before 5 paragraphs of justification from Rapid when Finland doesn't even want a reply to this post and just wants Rapid to try to take advice from reasonable players.
I've been reasonae for too long! Time to go on vamo mode! Now I can control all elements: explo valuebetting, explo bluffing, explo folding and explo calling! I'm the avatar! Vaaaamooooo
I've been reasonae for too long! Time to go on vamo mode! Now I can control all elements: explo valuebetting, explo bluffing, explo folding and explo calling! I'm the avatar! Vaaaamooooo
Now you just have to learn when the right time to use them is.
Now you just have to learn when the right time to use them is.
Yes! I think if I can control my emotions and keep making good folds while calling people light in some spots I think they will have enough bluffs, everything will go well. Just gotta avoid calling everything after some successful calls lol. The aggro part of my game is really solid imo, needed help in the passive part of my game.
Btw, ran a sim on A4s, jamming the river has a +20bb EV than checking back vs pio. But OOP had 0 AQ OTR, because pio fastplays those OTF and jam ott, while population probably get to the river with almost all AQ. Also monker 4-bet all AQo combos and population calls almost all AQo, but population calls more garbage than monker which mitigates this effect.
Then I ran a sim SB vs btn and A4s was jamming less than 20% and checking most of the time, mostly because btn has all AQ in his range and maybe because hero is OOP. Running a sim btn vs CO atm not allowing OOP to raise the flop.
Those BTN vs CO spots are weird to sim because everyone plays them so different, some guys overcall the 3bet, some play mostly 4-bet-folding, it's very hard to ger accurate ranges.
After looking at the sim I don't hate the x back that much, if villain has all AQ in his range, it doesn't take many Ax folds to make the A4s jam lower EV than x back and my read is that population defends with TPWK less often than pio (surprise lol).
I think this was one of the rare times when I agree that mirage is right lol(with pio proof).
btw, funny fact about that river, pio folds half of KQ OTR and calls AJ/A5 at the same frequency, it probably happens to balance OOP's calling range blockers, because if OOP decided to overvalue KQ and undervalue A5s, then IP would have way more profitable KT/KJ/Qx bluffs.
Another funny fact is that OTT IP will barrel very very aggressively if OOP has no shoving range, going thin even with 99-JJ. After making OOP play his range as a call OTF/OTT, OTR A4 almost always x back and A4ss has a 40bb EV if jamming while A4hh is jamming like 25% of the time with a 53bb ev. This has to do with OOP only having AQs and Qs is blocked by the board already, so A4hh blocks all AQhh.
In that scenario IP isn't even valuebetting AQ which is weird(EV difference between x back and jam is 0) why do you guys think it's like that? Really weird and didn't expect that. Maybe because AQ blocks villain's calling range and hero will already have JT/AK and that in such tight spots the ranges will interact a lot with its blockers, making it hard even for pio to find value given the blocker effects. Also that most IP's bluffs OTR will have SDV and will have the option to x back and win, making it not viable to turn those hands into bluffs.
We're still friends, finland agrees with most of my plays and he is just trolling here lol. A lot of these new plays I learned with finland/pio haha!
Doesn't seem like he's trolling to me. Why do you think he's trolling?
You use that justification when you don't agree with someone. "This person doesn't agree with the way I played this hand, he must be a troll". Instead of accepting the fact that maybe what you're doing is wrong.
No ****ing ****. You think that because he agrees with your play and #justification(with pio proof!!!!).
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpinMeRightRound
Doesn't seem like he's trolling to me. Why do you think he's trolling?
You use that justification when you don't agree with someone. "This person doesn't agree with the way I played this hand, he must be a troll". Instead of accepting the fact that maybe what you're doing is wrong.
Quote:
H11: Is this too thin OTR? I thought that on that texture I wouldn't get that many calls from worse given JT got there, villain has a lot of AQ and he will probably not defend a lot of Ax. It looks so nitty to check this back, meh
I was thinking my play was wrong after thinking a bit, so your point isn't valid