I wasn't talking about the next 100 days, smartypants. I was talking up to this point. Of COURSE you'll modify your sedentary lifestyle in the face of a bet!
I wasn't talking about the next 100 days, smartypants. I was talking up to this point. Of COURSE you'll modify your sedentary lifestyle in the face of a bet!
Wierd bet.
I take it! 10000$ 100 days with documentation that im working out more then i sit on the ground.
I can video record 12h a day f,ex. 8h is for sleep. 4h private time.
So how u wanna do this?
We need escrows. U got any?if not I arrange.
gotta point out that if you're willing to video yourself working out for 12 hours a day, 100 days straight for only 10k you must not be making much playing poker
gotta point out that if you're willing to video yourself working out for 12 hours a day, 100 days straight for only 10k you must not be making much playing poker
Where did i say anything about working out 12h a day.
I wasn't talking about the next 100 days, smartypants. I was talking up to this point. Of COURSE you'll modify your sedentary lifestyle in the face of a bet!
Considering u have 12000 post in 2 years i guess its smart to stop here....
ok so you binked 10 or 12k and you cashed out 16k, that means you've made a grand total of about what 4 or 5k from cash games?
400$/month
baller
Sadly not everyone can make as much as self proclaimed 'I'm better than Doug Polk' ballers like yourself. Been around 12 years during the gravy train era and still stuck bum hunting 2k games. lul. No evidence you have profited more than me or anyone here, this year btw.
Sadly not everyone can make as much as self proclaimed 'I'm better than Doug Polk' ballers like yourself. Been around 12 years during the gravy train era and still stuck bum hunting 2k games. lul. No evidence you have profited more than me or anyone here, this year btw.
Btw, volume has been pretty small,took 10 days off from poker this month to see friends also had 2 tests, meh, feel so ashamed to be playing very little. I dont mind posting bad hands or results, but feel bad posting low volume. Will see what can I do, but I think I won't be able to put some massive volume until the end of the month
Phrases like smartypants and talks about pokerwinnings, heights ,weight and cant see the differance between ground and chair/sofa no angles there.
I can see the difference, you're just a non-native English speaker who takes things very literally. That's called an angle. Here, in THIS COUNTRY, that doesn't add inches to your pecker. It carries a life sentence!
When's the last time we got an updated lifetime graph Mr. Vamooo?
Some 20 pages ago, after my last downswing, not looking really good lol. Will post my lifetime again in the update at the end of the month, don't like looking at the results very often. Roll is probably at 4k
Volume this month was so ******ed, couldn't play in the last 4 days because internet was terrible.
Played well today
Some hands
H1: vs reg that was raising flop at a very low frequency, good fold? Meh, I think he could have a lot of weaker 2p and his sizing OTR was smaller than it looked like for me. He was quite nitty, so I don't think he would raise the flop with a lot of offsuit bdfd combos. Could I beat enough of his value to make this +EV?
H2: do you guys think it's better to call or bluff-raise this? I feel like this hand is too strong to turn into a bluff, but if villain always has an Ax at best and is folding it, then raising looks so good. Do you think people fold Ax enough?
H3: vs unknown, snap call OTF, snap call OTT, good x/f? I think he has so many Tx in his range, and most of them go with a straight draw OTT, making those easy calls, he could have straights as well. I can't find many bluffs for him and I block his Axcc bluffs. Should I call without the Ac?
Question here for you guys, imagine you have QTcc or 56cc and 2 sizing options: close to 100% and 33%, which hand would you put on each of the ranges? For value we have AJ+ in the big sizing and Weak Ax/some Kx in the small one.
Spoiler:
In the hand finland had QTcc and opted for a small sizing. During the hand I figured out that QTcc wasn't a good hand to be bluffing small, but that it would do better as a bluff in the big sizing.
My reasoning was that when we're using the small sizing, we're basically targetting 9x-QQ with our valuebet, trying to make that part of his range have a breakeven call. When bluffing, we obviously want to make hands like QQ/TT to fold, while villain is always calling Ax vs that small sizing. So QT blocks those hands that we want him to fold for our sizing.
When using that small sizing, I think it's better to be bluffing with a hand like 65cc which unblocks that kind of hand that will fold(or will have a close spot), so it makes more sense to use QT in our bigger sizing, because when we hold QT, we're not targeting QQ/TT folds anymore, but Ax ones. Also QT blocks AT and 56 blocks his weaker Ax, which villain should be more likely to fold before folding AT if we decide to bet big with that hand.
Obviously if we're giving villain a breakeven decision and he knows it, then he will call some QQ/TT at a mixed frequency, but if villain is making a mistake of folding too much, then he will fold more with those QQ/TT hands vs the small sizing.