Pete Clarke is out to destroy low stakes. - Page 4 - Poker Blogs and Goals -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion Poker Blogs and Goals

Pete Clarke is out to destroy low stakes.

View Poll Results: What winrate will Pete achieve?

5-15bb/100

75 77.32%

15-25bb/100

9 9.28%

25bb/100 +++

13 13.40%

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 4 of 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Page 4 of 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

01-13-2024 , 07:44 AM

#76

chiefsfan17

veteran

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 2,045

a guy who doesn't even play poker claiming he can beat 100nl is hilarious just by itself

Quote

01-13-2024 , 12:07 PM

#77

oneselfishguy

adept

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 829

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10najkrajsi

you will never get 65% rb

realistic rb is 40%

if you put in enough volume and get decent results in leaderboard and hit jackpots you get 65%

Quote

01-13-2024 , 12:08 PM

#78

Haizemberg93

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 7,255

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicroDonkYT

These are the top 20 winners at 100nl over the last year on GG 100nl regular tables. As you can see, there are very few players over 150k hands with a winrate over 5bb. Keep in mind, that these guys probably table select well, and the fast fold games will be much lower EV, as the regs are fish are much tighter preflop.

I like how that guy run 220bb over 5k hands and he was done for a year.

Quote

01-13-2024 , 06:28 PM

#79

10najkrajsi

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2021 Posts: 113

Quote:

Originally Posted by oneselfishguy

if you put in enough volume and get decent results in leaderboard and hit jackpots you get 65%

My calculation from the last month at nl200 RNC:

Fish buffet 14% rb, GG care 2,85%
from LD : for 8k hands avg rb 7,8%
--------------------------

So without BBJ it is 24,65% (BBJ lets say 1bb/100 it is 12,5%)

SO together you get RB 37% !!! HOW CAN YOU GET 60%?

Quote

01-16-2024 , 07:57 AM

#80

oneselfishguy

adept

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 829

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10najkrajsi

claim is based on my personal results last 5 months playing 800k hands NL50-100 wr -0.78
without BBJ you can NOT get 65%, you can literally play 45 days everyday and get 0 jackpots and then in 10 days get 2 big jackpots...
rakeback includes all possible $ that room gives you

Last edited by oneselfishguy; 01-16-2024 at 08:06 AM.

Quote

01-16-2024 , 08:12 AM

#81

Lim Jahey

enthusiast

Join Date: Feb 2021 Posts: 92

Oneselfish, what happened, I remember you had a thread at nl50z (which is considered tougher pool than GG) with 4bb/100 EV winrate over 1.4m hands, how you lose now basically in the same games -0.8bb/100 ?

Quote

01-16-2024 , 08:14 AM

#82

Lim Jahey

enthusiast

Join Date: Feb 2021 Posts: 92

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10najkrajsi

Run well with jackpots or fight for top 1-3 on LB's I guess

Quote

01-16-2024 , 08:32 AM

#83

oneselfishguy

adept

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 829

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lim Jahey

you get old with time, also personal and investing decisions can influence a lot your results...

Quote

01-16-2024 , 10:02 AM

#84

10najkrajsi

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2021 Posts: 113

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lim Jahey

Run well with jackpots or fight for top 1-3 on LB's I guess

BBJ ->fee is around 1-1,5bb/100 so in my calculation i used that you will get 1bb as standart. So "Run well with jackpots" is useless, it is same as you can be 20bb/100 winner just run good at tables

LD -> to get 1-3 places at LD you have to play 15-18 hours. Nobody who plays 15k hands per day can beat it. So you have to sacrifice you real winrate to get 1bb/100more rb. It is never worth, since nobody can play their A game 15hours a day.

Quote

01-16-2024 , 10:09 AM

#85

Lim Jahey

enthusiast

Join Date: Feb 2021 Posts: 92

I agree with you, but in that sense I commented how Oneselfishguy might have gotten 65% rb (over 800k hands, not forever), maybe binked alot of more jackpots than he should and thats why RB is higher also if you seen his thread years ago he is one of these guys who could pull of few days a week for top 3 spots.

Quote

01-16-2024 , 11:49 AM

#86

10najkrajsi

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2021 Posts: 113

yes and i write it in general. Since i won my first BBJ after 1,1M hands. +Now last 400k hands after i moved on higher limits i won only 1x second place!!!

Quote

01-16-2024 , 10:06 PM

#87

belthazorrrrr

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 2,221

is there a link where he posts his weekly/monthly results from an actual tracker (not pokercraft

) . I would like to follow his challenge while he is destroying rnc, pretty pointless for me to do it unless he provides actual graphs

Quote

01-23-2024 , 06:52 AM

#88

kolotoure2.0

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2018 Posts: 423

He will obviously just go quiet when he works out he is somewhere around breakeven in the pool

Quote

01-26-2024 , 01:44 PM

#89

Royalhouse11

enthusiast

Join Date: May 2019 Posts: 93

Do we have any updates on this challenge? Seems to be pretty quiet about it.

Just like Carrel backing out his challenge

Quote

01-29-2024 , 08:51 AM

#90

kolotoure2.0

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2018 Posts: 423

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royalhouse11

Do we have any updates on this challenge? Seems to be pretty quiet about it.

Just like Carrel backing out his challenge

These people are extremely deluded about their edge in these games. Once they play some hands they realize they have nowhere near as big an edge as they think. There is a reason that Clarke is a (hugely overcharging) coach and not playing poker regularly.

Not sure why these people who don't play in these games think they can jump in these games and instantly achieve winrates significantly higher than people who have been grinding the games for a long time

Quote

01-29-2024 , 11:00 AM

#91

ViktorKaBloooom

centurion

Join Date: Jan 2024 Posts: 105

100z on GG has a very decent rec to reg ratio right? At least this seems to be what Peter is saying. He might not be as good as he think he is, but I never found anything particularly terrible about him either, and he is going the “cool guys” exploit route.

So, why is 9 bb/100 (he said that number right?), including all rake back and bonuses, so outlandish?

Quote

01-29-2024 , 11:34 AM

#92

kolotoure2.0

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2018 Posts: 423

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViktorKaBloooom

Look at the rake structure on GG and you will see why

Quote

01-29-2024 , 11:56 AM

#93

ImePaskaa

journeyman

Join Date: Oct 2023 Posts: 218

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViktorKaBloooom

So, why is 9 bb/100 (he said that number right?), including all rake back and bonuses, so outlandish?

He is claiming to make that modest or decent (can't remember what he said) winrate pre rb and we all know that is impossible. Don't know what kind of wrs the best regs that are beating the lbs are making. Are they even making 9bbs / 100 post rb?

Checked out his youtube and it's quite active. Unfortunately the last video about this is from 2 months ago. With this rate it will take 10 years to complete this. Unless he allready gave up.

Last edited by ImePaskaa; 01-29-2024 at 12:03 PM.

Quote

01-29-2024 , 12:37 PM

#94

Xenoblade

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Sep 2017 Posts: 4,090

he prob won’t give any update on this until he is done

9bb/100 pre rakeback with this rake structure is likely impossible 6 handed

Quote

01-29-2024 , 12:55 PM

#95

MattD1

enthusiast

Join Date: Jan 2024 Posts: 66

I highly doubt Pete will achieve this.

I think he overestimates his capabilities. I don't even know if I think he's winning in the top Rush & Cash pools.

But...

I have yet to find anyone else who teaches poker from the basics up, grounded in theory and teaches core principles I can learn from instead of getting buried in specific plays in every single spot where there are a lot of similarities.

I'd love to hear if anyone has recommendations on someone/somewhere they think is better but has a similar approach to teaching poker.

I also feel his courses are overpriced, but again, I'm yet to see a similar product. I've tried Upswing, PokerCoaching, RIO.

Quote

01-29-2024 , 01:03 PM

#96

ViktorKaBloooom

centurion

Join Date: Jan 2024 Posts: 105

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuayThai

In newest youtube video Pete has admitted that he is aiming for modest 8-9 bb/100 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmSB...PokerEducation 19:45 mark.

He is insufferable and I can't watch the entire video, but nowhere around the 19:45 mark does he mention pre rakeback, or anything about rake. You only need a brain to assume it is after rakeback, with GG rake and zoom format this is obvious, isn't it? But if you have another vid where he mentions pre rakeback explicitly, I am all ears.

Last edited by ViktorKaBloooom; 01-29-2024 at 01:09 PM.

Quote

01-29-2024 , 01:26 PM

#97

ViktorKaBloooom

centurion

Join Date: Jan 2024 Posts: 105

Even the GOAT ishter11 (stakes higher than 100nl but I think Cameron is way way better player than Peter Clarke) never mentions he crushes anything pre rakeback on GG.

Quote

01-29-2024 , 01:51 PM

#98

ImePaskaa

journeyman

Join Date: Oct 2023 Posts: 218

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViktorKaBloooom

You only need a brain to assume pre rb because he is talking about winrate. Generally speaking when players talk about wr that means before any bonuses.

Quote

01-29-2024 , 02:46 PM

#99

ViktorKaBloooom

centurion

Join Date: Jan 2024 Posts: 105

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImePaskaa

You only need a brain to assume pre rb because he is talking about winrate. Generally speaking when players talk about wr that means before any bonuses.

Make an youtube account, or a runitonce, then politely ask him if he means pre or post rb. Say there is no hate involved, just that you think GG rake is too high to 9 bb/100 as he said to be possible, but if he meant it, then we all wish success to him. If he says he really means pre rb, leave the room slowly without further eye contact or giving him your back, and at a safe distance, run for your life

Quote

01-30-2024 , 07:30 AM

#100

kolotoure2.0

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2018 Posts: 423

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViktorKaBloooom

Not sure why you would assume a winrate is after rb? If someone asks me my winrate/ROI in tournaments I would tell them what it is sans bonuses and rakeback

Quote

Page 4 of 11

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 4 of 11

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Last