Quote:
Originally Posted by MDMA Hero
Honestly, It really depends on where you are skill wise, and how much risk you can handle, how sound your mental game is, I could go on. I don't exactly know the details, but if you don't have a clear idea of your winrate/skill, I would grind like 50k-100k hands at NL5. The skill difference won't be huge between NL5-NL25, could be wrong but yeah. It's more important to get in a sample and understand where you are in your game rather than to rush the moving up process, if you are a sound winner at NL5, you will shoot up to NL25 as long as you dont have major mental game/skill leaks.
Thanks for your advice. Skillwise (hopefully I don't overestimate myself, if that is even a word) I should be able to beat the stakes up to 25NL. I have already beaten that stake over a decent size sample. Mentally (as you are saying) it is a different cup of tea. I'm in full control of my tilt issues but I'm getting scared to lose when I'm up 2/3 buy-ins (no idea why) and also my confidence drops down a lot when I have a losing session.
Quote:
I'm not sure I agree with this since most can easily afford to reload $100 but the time it takes to play 100k hands could possibly turn out to cost way more than that. Time is money.
Of course there are circumstances that could sway my take in the other direction but playing 100s of thousands of hands at NL2-NL10 just seems like a colossal waste of time in the grand scheme of things unless you're just playing for fun. Then again maybe I'm out of touch, who knows.
GL with the challenge OP
I do agree with this. I think the higher stakes you play the more you learn skillwise. But still I need to take the 'mental part' in consideration.
I'm going for an in-between way of your answers: I will play 5NL untill my bankroll is up to $200. If I drop down to $130 I will be playing 5NL unitll I'm back to $220. Than when I drop down to $150 I will be playing NL5 to $250.
Then again I'm confident I maybe won't even drop down at all
Thank you for your answers!