My journey to $1 000 000 (challenge done)
11-08-2012
, 04:38 AM
Hey Giev, was wondering if you wanna share your input on this hand: 
Quote:
Poker Stars $2/$4 No Limit Hold'em - 4 players - View hand 1955725
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter
Hero (BB): $400.00
CO: $326.00
BTN: $400.00
SB: $400.00
Pre Flop: ($6.00) Hero is BB with 3
9
CO calls $4, 1 fold, SB calls $2, Hero checks
Flop: ($12.00) T
9 9
(3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $8, CO raises to $20, SB folds, Hero calls $12
Turn: ($52.00) 5
(2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $36, Hero calls $36
River: ($124.00) 2 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $266 all in, Hero folds
Final Pot: $124.00
CO wins $122.50
(Rake: $1.50)
CO is completely unknown. What would be the worst hand to call with here? J9 maybe?
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter
Hero (BB): $400.00
CO: $326.00
BTN: $400.00
SB: $400.00
Pre Flop: ($6.00) Hero is BB with 3
9CO calls $4, 1 fold, SB calls $2, Hero checks
Flop: ($12.00) T
9 9 (3 players)SB checks, Hero bets $8, CO raises to $20, SB folds, Hero calls $12
Turn: ($52.00) 5
(2 players)Hero checks, CO bets $36, Hero calls $36
River: ($124.00) 2
(2 players)Hero checks, CO bets $266 all in, Hero folds
Final Pot: $124.00
CO wins $122.50
(Rake: $1.50)
CO is completely unknown. What would be the worst hand to call with here? J9 maybe?
11-08-2012
, 06:21 AM
to answer guev's question, if we put villain on exclusively 9x which is possible but not 100% probable we can start calling with Q9. we need just over 40% equity vs his range which j9 doesnt have. only if he takes this same line with Q
J, J8 KJ AND KJ every single time, J9 becomes a slight breakeven call. i wouldnt exactly assume an unknown often decides to go this batsht crazy with more pure bluffs so i d think 4 combos of possible bluffs seems about right. so we can call Q9+ here
(i assumed random's imp range that does this for value with is 96s+, 98o+)
J, J8 KJ AND KJ every single time, J9 becomes a slight breakeven call. i wouldnt exactly assume an unknown often decides to go this batsht crazy with more pure bluffs so i d think 4 combos of possible bluffs seems about right. so we can call Q9+ here(i assumed random's imp range that does this for value with is 96s+, 98o+)
11-08-2012
, 10:34 AM
11-08-2012
, 01:23 PM
11-08-2012
, 03:18 PM
Quote:
Giev, i am interested in your bankroll management particularly when you were moving 200NL-600NL how many buy ins did you have? did it tilt you more when losing playing less optimally rolled then not? or was the difference minimal.
Where you 100% sure you could beat the games instead of shot taking (large samples etc) you just came from instead of shot taking new limits?
Where you 100% sure you could beat the games instead of shot taking (large samples etc) you just came from instead of shot taking new limits?
No I don't have.
11-09-2012
, 01:28 AM
11-09-2012
, 01:33 AM
Haven't been running very good last couple of weeks..
Month looking like this so far:
Month looking like this so far:
11-09-2012
, 11:42 AM
11-09-2012
, 04:55 PM
Nah, worst ds is -60buyins this year (and probably all time too).
11-09-2012
, 06:32 PM
Just realised that it has now been over 2 years since I made this thread. 
11-09-2012
, 06:39 PM
Happy 2 year anniversary honey
11-09-2012
, 07:13 PM
Happy anniversary! should be celebrated by a big ass bottle of champagne and a lifetime graph 
congrats on keeping your resolve to keep posting Giev, keep it up man
congrats on keeping your resolve to keep posting Giev, keep it up man
11-10-2012
, 11:17 AM
This is graph since the day I made this thread. Kinda puts in perspective my latest 'downswing'. I know I shouldn't care about the short term results but it's just so damn hard not to.
11-10-2012
, 11:21 AM
