Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel9861
Hand seems fine. Maybe go smaller on turn to attack AK whiffs. Either that or start overbetting against a range that is capped at AQ/AA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meale
Think it's fine as played. Alternatively just pot turn and bang it off on the river.
I was kinda thinking along these lines. Basically trying to fold AK, potentially fold out more on some rivers with a big sizing. Have a lot of strong hands dont have many bluffs. IP range is somewhat capped
I plugged this into the solver. IP flop cbet was 40% and favored checking back most combos of AK/AQ and surprisingly JJ more than AA. Thought it'd be the other way around for protection reasons.
When the flop goes x,x I gave the OOP player 5 options for sizing and thought it was interesting it bet at a 75% frequency or more depending on which sizings were allowed. I think if you node locked the IP player to no raises vs turn probe (more realistic imo) that number would be close to 100%. It preferred a 22% sizing and then a 1.5x pot sizing, nothing really in the middle. Seems like I'm allowed to bet so much since my range is so strong. JT gets there plus we have sets/2p/overpairs. AJ/AT/KJ are the only unpaired combos, 3 of which are combo draws.
I'd think jamming blank rivers picking the combos without hearts makes the most sense. Thought it was interesting that after a turn call and a river 2c the solver chooses to bluff the most with KJ and some AT (all suits), and check AJ 100%. Maybe because it doesn't want to block Axs/Jxs pairs that call turn.