dat graph doe. team<3 at it's best. Well played buddy

That graph is seriously sick. Congrats on the well deserved success.

It's so pretty

beautiful graph!

sickness <3

............
wow

Grats on 100k, now let's rename thread 500z and up

ooooh my that graph is peng af

O.O

hah ty guys!

I have basically lived and breathed poker for the last 18 months so it's nice to see it paying off!



___________________________________


I didn't want to deal with 500z swings today so I just played with the kiddies at 200z

PS tried to doomswitch me for punishment for yesterdays rungood/bragging but I did my very best to resist!







-----------------------------------



some heros

That 100k graph is truly insane! Looking forward to 200k graph next month

Really rare to see a graph like that in 2013+

wankfest is strong in this thread.

N1 <3

_____________________________________



500z pool was meh so I stuck with 200z today. I played very well but I do love me some 200z







---------------


Don't know how villain xbs here, he's winning approximately 0% of the time

Seems like easy 100% cbet spot, no?

OR not xDD

There aren't going to be (m)any spots where you should take one action 100% of the time.. I think cbetting would be my lowest frequency play of all three strategic options.

__________________________________________



meh day.. I didn't play very well at all and I would've lost money if it wasn't for favorable distribution. I could be suffering from mild winners-tilt






----------------------

Hi
I just discovered this thread, graz to the 100k graph, looks awesome
Just see the redline in your OP, looks little bit like my own microstakes graph. There come up some questions for me as a microgrinder,
did you change your style in moving up the limits to playing a more BE (or +) redline? Do you think its possible to be a good winner @100NL and below with a around -7 to -10 bb/100 redline or do you recommend a complete playing style change? (And if yes, do you have some tips therefore; just if you want to write)
Thx i a

Do you check results a lot in game? Because every graph is pretty much you rostucko'n everytime youre losing

I wouldn't be too concerned about SD/NSD winnings as they are a function of individual style, overall strategy and game conditions. Just strive to continually improve and make less mistakes than your opponents and you'll do fine. That said, interestingly a lot of the bots accounts that were beating up micros through midstakes were NSD-orientated, likely capitalizing on weak populations and their propensity to over-fold everywhere.



Nah, I don't check results mid-session unless I'm getting absolutely slaughtered (forcing me to evaluate, apply stop-loss and sitout etc). I do however tend to play longer sessions + more hands while I'm losing so naturally I will rostucko reasonably often, or dig a really deep hole

Ishter what is your stop loss, i never really believed in them but i just had 2 -6bi sessions in a row in only 10k hands of zoom (first time playing zoom). Honestly i don't know how you guys can make a profit on that it seems every other hand someone has a set.

i personally use -5bi a session and -10bi a day for zoom.

id say -3bi per session and -6bi for the day for micro grinders given they will all* have pretty weak mental games.

Not alot of people are able to play well after losing 6bi for the day, Exhibit A

I don't enforce strict stop-losses, it's more a combination of stopping when I'm playing poorly, losing a lot and game conditions aren't fantastic. I will usually call it a day if I'm stuck more than 5bi and the tables are meh



__________________________________________________



I was able to find my A-game today. I'm planning on grinding out another 10k hands at 200z and then calling it a month.






I made a really nice omelette for lunch that I'm rather proud of. It was with bacon, onions, plenty of cheese obviously, oregano, basil, cayenne pepper and ground black pepper. Mmm it was tasty




gl team!