Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalSee
I'm in a similar situation, and am planning on doing almost exactly what you described after I garduate college. Given, I have three years to learn, improve, and study; but I will be in the boat with you in a couple years.
I'm not here to talk about me though. I'm here to wish you the best of luck, and you're right: chase your dream while you're still young and have nothing to lose. If people can't do that then why live at all? You know?
You only got a 20% chance so the odds are you cant do it.
I read a book recently "winning secrets of poker". On page 33 in the sklansky interview he shockingly says that the average player will never be a winning player. He goes on to say that Even if you study and are industrious and do everything right you have a 20% chance v the 1% chance for other non studious players of being a winning player. Not enough memory, IQ etc.., he then goes on to compare it to playing golf and trying to get to being a 77 player. It made me realise hes right even if you are booked up, play mechanically excetra you can still fail due to more psycholical factors:
Bankroll (Too little) so variance knocks you out
Memory, can you remember spocific players and how they play thier hands (Even years later like TJ Cloutier).
Do you have the killer instinct to make your oppoenents "pay" (Maximise your value)
Money management, so you dont move up too fast etc
Stamina (WIll to win) I remembr going down $350 in 4/8 at orleans in 6 hours and continuing to play for the next 18 hours straight and ending up $60.
Table and opponent choice (soft tables, weak opponents)
DICIPLINE I once saw one of the best poker pros play maybe 6-10 hands in 5 hours, fold 4 of those post flop, go down to the river twice lose one hand and split one pot in 10/20 Omaha hilo. He was just running cold , but showed incrediuble discipline in spite of losing 8/10 hands he played.
And we could go on, Advanced strategy, and book knowledge is just the start.....
Last example, Ive seen several WSOP final table players (Frankie o dell, PLO European players, Razz master (WHo started with K up and beat two other players showing A and 3 and gave a running commentry about how he was going to win the hand), Shifty (Horse wsop finalist) and none of them were playing according to the book so there appears to be knowledge out there thats not in the books yet, sort of NL tourney knowledge pre Harringtons books. Makes me realise Sklansky is proably right.