Allright. I have finished 2 of my 3 today's sessions now and have only one hour till I go watch a local football match live. For you football fans here, it's the national top league, but Finnish, so it'll be a ~2k attendance low quality match (in international comparison lol). Maybe in my forecasted lifetime we will get to one Euro or World Championship tourney
Anyways I use this hour for some extra rambling.
Grind routine
Plan is to keep on playing 3x2 hour sessions daily now. When I get more stamina (so that I still feel focused and solid after 2 hours), I will add an extra hour to one of the sessions. Maybe later a second one, and a third. So eventually after quite a long term I'd have 3x3 h sessions. This is NOT a short term goal. I will be honest to myself now. I would get burnt out trying to apply that too fast. When I get burnt out I used to drink beer and it means 2 days of not playing at all. It's better I won't overdo things, but play disciplined and keep it calm.
Solid tight or nitty? Spewy or solid laggy?
These are interesting terms. I have noticed that when I feel I play solid tight poker, some friends would go ahead and describe some of those decisions too nitty. So it's like a double-edged sword, on one hand it's often good to play tight solid poker, unless you use the other edge and become a nit.
Same I guess could be said about lagginess. At best it's great aggressive poker, which could slip into spewyness. I need to think deeply about these definitions some day. One option is to FORGET those classifications and simply think about each decision in terms of their mathematical value. So instead of thinking my decision was too nitty here or there, I must solve that problem and get to conclude that a check or a fold there cost 3-4 bb's to me in expected value. This way I dont start to identify myself as a nit or a spewtard. Ever.
Self-fulfilling prophecy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy
IF you think you are too nitty, you become too nitty. IF your friends say you are too nitty, you become too nitty. And it'll be hard to change that.
It's good to be breakeven now
I have enough hands (overall) to say I'm a breakeven player after rake historically (in PLO). (So the little money comes from RB and bonuses). I will try to forget history. However, this is not such a bad spot to be in. As long as I aim for constant improvement, also by strong commitment to plugging mental leaks, i should already gain a couple of bb's to the winrate.
But I must say one thing: currently it is very difficult for me to find very systematical technical leaks that could be plugged easily. Obviously I do a great amount of mistakes all the time, but it's not like are of a certain type, I feel. Sometimes a decision is too nitty and sometimes overoptimistically spewy. So maybe at the moment I will mainly just concentrate on staying focused and doing all I can to play well. When that is under control, I can more easily evaluate the technical aspects of my game and leaks that occur even under game A premises.