Quote:
Originally Posted by d--b
Subbed.
Do you think micro plo is not beatable/ very hard to beat due to rake? I am currently trying at zoom plo.
Its beatable.. but its not worth your time. Don't stay in the micros long. I went against this advice in this thread for sub-par reasons. Many friends advised I skip PLO10/25. I think they are right. If I did it over I would start at PLO50. Over the last 2 years I've given more value to time. Time really is money. I suppose its an aging thing..
I'm reading a bit of Mental game of poker 2 daily. Today I read the first section of the "Learning" chapter. It put things in perspective for me. Particularly "Skill transference" which is the idea that some skills learned/mastered in certain environments are not transferable to other environments. If you read this thread, you know I struggle with this. Jared breaks things down into levels. Like level 2 being lower stakes soft games, level 4 being a final table in a big mtt. Skills don't tranfer directly from one level to another. For instance, a PLO100 BB squeeze vs $1/2 live BB squeeze. Or bet sizing on the turn in PLO100 vs a reg vs bet sizing on the turn live $1/2 vs a fish.
I'll write more about my readings later-- roomies are eager to hit the tables and I have the van powers.
For today; I'm going to make sure to go through an extremely exploitable thought process of thinking about what I'm trying to accomplish with my bet, think of the pot size/stack size, choosing a size accordingly, and then bet. Max value, cheap bluffs, and almost completely ignore my perceived range.
Must remember: I'm playing these games because everyone sucks; no one is going to exploit me.
Vegas totals:
Profit: $3200.00
Hours: 64.75