I don’t know. One thing I know for sure is that if I’m confronting 3 suckouts every time at the start of session and every time there aces against my kings and every time set against my aces we’re not seeing profit.

at the risk of being ignored, have you considered removing 94o from your 3b shoving range?

in this entire thread, has pastings ever posted his vpip/pfr, or am i the only one that's posted his stats.

You really are special 👍 keep doing your thing crushing the red line and crushing the negative green and yellow line. 😂

Year started and we have the new record of how much suckouts you can confront. $342,17 to suckouts, it's massive it's almost 70 buy ins to suckouts on nl5. After years of poker with massive running under ev this can still be possible. And this definitely should not be possible to lose this much to worst hands.

This tell many things. These guys that are talking about beating levels with 20 buy ins and then up are pure hoaxers. They haven't beated even nl2 because they run from level before suckouting starts. When they play these amount of hands than I do they will destroyed for sure. This site should permanently ban those people like Confucius96 who is hoaxing peoples money giving coaching with not beated even nl2. This is what playing those level looks like. What is enough bankroll for these levels if you been suckouted 342 dollars?

Isn't it little bit funny too that I haven't myself managed to suckout those people even in single month with over 15 years of poker. As you can see from start of graph it's sky rocketing up. Why? Because I outplay brutally those open cards players. This puts me thinking why suckouting started immediately after that.

Only thing that is funny is the fact that you still after 15 years haven't had a single month with positive ev. You lose double digits bb/100 in ev every single month and still somehow can turn it like you should be winning. Yeah you run bad but why don't you accept the fact that you are really really really bad? You lost more than 100 bins in ev last month? Would you be happy if there were no suckouts and you run over ev?

skyrocketing for 300 hands, congrats Paisting.

Just an unlucky stretch paisting. Surely 2023 will be the year you win.

Confirmed unluckiest player ever. You'll still win in the long run(it's just longer for you), keep grinding bro.

I know and can see the perfect winning strategy for you Paisting. Simply stop playing at around 500 hands each month. Most your charts I've seen since I started watching this train wreck have you winning or at least even to that point.

Crazy how truly easy 2nl actually is to beat even with all the callers, suck outs and coolers. Up $27+ after 12,556 hands now. If it wasn't for a terrible Jan 1st and 2nd I would already be playing 5nl(after less 13k hands). Even with my horrible 2 days early in Jan that had me down $17-$18 I still came back and made a small profit for the month. Been playing since Oct and still haven't had a losing month. Go caveman poker lol.

My biggest problem isn't winning it's getting volume and having a real life, family and good balance.


Cheers!!!

Lol didn't even notice that. 10 bins up - suckout - dump 125ish bins in ev - complain about running bad.

Also why are you playing NL5 Paisting? Have you beaten NL2 yet?

His plan is to play 15 years at NL5 to prove that it's unbeatable (by him) and then move up to NL10

Don't you know that most of us are here to watch a trainwreck and marvel at how unbelievably stupid you are?

Then I'll always call because I'm getting better than 1:1.

If you know their cards why don't you just call and fold on the turn/river if their cards hit. I mean, how dumb are you.

Btw if you really thought it was rigged you wouldn't be playing anymore. It's an easy excuse surely.

What you think for real? Can you read that graph? It's 70 buy ins below ev! Where you see that kind of graphs? Do you understand that they suggest 250 dollars to play nl5 and that amount wasn't even enough how much I did lose to mostly 85% equity suckouts. You can see from past month graphs that there are massive running under ev but this is record, totally insane.

Have you seen that I've posted half year graphs that are running over ev before this and do you really can read those hands that I've posted where I confront massive amount suckouts with 85%+ equity? And do you understand that on last month I lost 70 buy ins to suckouts? 70 buy ins. I wanna ask because your comment just make no sense.

Yes, you lost 70 BI to suckouts. How many BI in total did you lose for the month?
(Hint - it is more than 70.)
Why is that, do you think?

I literally have no idea. You refuse to post history about situations you claim printing. Like cold calling Q7s on the button. Telling why are you playing NL5 when you have lost 100k + to NL2 and haven't beaten that yet. Why do you jam sheet pre (there are hands posted from other players) for 200bb?

So i ask you again. If you faces zero suckouts and your ev is 10bb over and you lose 150 bins because you are horrible would be happy then?

You just can not beat the rake if you are not exceptionally good. You seem to be just a bad reg.

Rake has nothing to do with those suckouts. I also think that talking about rake effects are way too overrated. I know very well that you lose more than you win in 1 specific hand when stacks go in but still rake is something you can’t blame about these suckouts.

So You think only reason why You are loosing are those suckouts , if not them, You would be winning?
BTW , big fan of You and Your pre shoves with T6o... do it all for that red line!

And yet once again you refuse to tell us why do you jam sheet like T6 54 pre for 200bbs and how much money you are printing by cold calling T7s on the btn. You literally live in a little bubble with your delusions that the internet poker is somehow rigged against you and that is the only reason for losing 15 years nonstop. Peace.

You know, I'm starting to think you might be right about the sites hoaxing and making it so certain players lose to suck outs. Think about it. We already saw you are a sicko redline crusher who outplays the whales postflop. Without suckouts, there's no way these players could beat you and they would lose their money really fast.

BUT sites build a profile of each of their customers. They classify people as net depositor, net withdrawer, casual player, full-time grinder, etc. They also know that certain people might not redeposit after busting their account but others 100% will. You are probably the biggest depositor at micro limits of all time, so site doesn't care if you lose since they know you'll redeposit. Instead, they let the whales suck out so their money lasts longer and the site can generate more rake.