Quote:
Originally Posted by dochol31
Great as Unibet's rules and views for poker are, the anonymity of players makes it very likely to have collusion issues at higher stakes and given how long it takes to fix simple graphics bugs, I'm very skeptical as to how well these games are policed. I hope I'm wrong and will be reporting anything even the slightly wiffing of soft-playing.
On the contrary I havent seen anything dody up to the 10 euro games.
There're a few different things here.
First, fraud and development are different departments. One team's performance doesn't have much to do with another's.
Second, the graphics bug isn't simple, it's very hard indeed to track down. Otherwise it'd be fixed. This is also happening at a time that we're making version 2.0 of the client, which won't have any of the 1.0 client bugs. That means we can't drop everything just to track this bug down. I'm pretty unhappy that it's still in the client, but in this case we have to prioritise 2.0.
Third, we've invested a lot in the fraud team. We know that lack of hand histories means it's not possible for the community to track colluders/bots down. That's a fundamental risk of our strategy, and so we know we have to be strong here. Obviously this just ends up going on trust, but I hope that e.g. not seeing anything dodgy in the small games goes some way to earning that trust.