Quote:
Originally Posted by zz44pp00
nice gg . i think you should take at least 3 days off before the series to not lose the energy you need at the end of the series. glgl
Yeah, I've decided to take that road. Doing bunch of reviewing everyday tho.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menace_2_Society
Great thread, GL!
Glad you like it.
---------------------------------
FREEROLL
I'm still okay with my miserable unhealthy list of habbits. Don't want to change anything atm as it seem that it would mess a lot with my poker plans,and as I already know this is an lousy excuse for being lazy AF. So MTT series are starting soon and then I have an big wedding but I plan to take some time off and make some drastic changes after it:
4 next posters get 50$ each if I don't start going to gym/hire personal trainer/start training anything on regular basis (3+ times per week) before October 1st.
---------------------------------
I'll add a little bit hand talk to this PGC, feel free to comment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomalice
I was CL from start to the end of the FT and villain was playing solid. This was like 50th or so hand of the HU so I had decent inisights in his strat and he likes to x/r these high card dry boards with standard goodBDs noSDV type of hands.
So on the flop I'm fine with either way between betting and checking altough I prefer betting this combo as it needs a lot of protection + it can handle a raise and continue on decent amount of turns. I was thinking about ingame adjusting with checking these type of boards more as I was getting x/raised a lot but it seemed like passive and loosing adjustment ingame and I don't like running from battling high variance close spots and aggressive brazilians.
When 5 falls and he checks I don't feel good about my hand as I was feeling OTF since a lot of his bluff x/r's now got paired. VS villains that aren't aggressive I would most likely shoot a 1/3 pot here with a bunch of my range (Q3dd included) and x behind river as a default, but vs aggro guys that will x/jam a lot OTT vs that sizing I'm being more picky about my bets ott so this seemed like a clear check as it still has some shaky showdown value, villain is kind of capped on 5x(with or without diamonds) / giveup most of the time
River was most interesting part of the hand. If he'd bet like 45-75% of the pot Id probably just snap muck it, but when i saw his pot sizing it got me thinking a little bit more. My percieved range OTR is bunch of 2x, 3x, 5x, pairs in between, Ax straights, some flushes. His pot sizing didn't made a lot of sense to me - he's basicly trying to represent a flush here while he'll continue barreling most of the fds OTT and checking possibly only 5Xdds that got paired. He wouldn't size this big with 6 high straight also as it seems harder for an ace to call it. Q3 is pretty much bottom of my range so it was an easy shove after all that thinking ( he could also fold a 6 occasionally if he ever has it, imo )
It's one of those spots where people make big mistakes of not considering theirs / villains ranges at all. It seems like he's thinking ''Ugh, that's a scary card - lets pot it with errrything'' ( this actually might be overall profitable vs these low/midstakes overfolding pools ), it doesn't matter at all that I have a lot more nutty hands in my range or that his line makes absolutely 0 sense.
Anyway, I guess there's a lot of money in these type of spots as people are either too passive either too aggro. I know how to play vs passive ones but I'm still learning how to make highest possible EV vs aggressive ones. Wasn't thinking a lot about it but I guess there are more chips to be won from the ones that are willing to handle you them themselves