Quote:
Originally Posted by coopah
Will answer this when I wake up!
So, reasons for choosing zoom over normal tables...
I guess to play more hands & easier to get SNE etc? None of this scripting sh*t/bumhunting/grimming etc. Downside is you can't really build up any table dynamic with anyone (although can build up some with regs if playing in the same player pool daily).
Quote:
Originally Posted by NL__Fool
I read this a few times and I am confused. Your saying the top 20 list, 18/20 would be NL1k regs but people who say zoom 500nl games are easier than 1knl games are wrong?
Wouldn't that confirm that Zoom games are easier than NL1k games?
So, if you got the 20 best 5/10 regs and the 20 best 2.5/5 regs, (so 40 players total), 18 out of the top 20 of these 40 players combined would be 5/10 players imo - Therefore, as 5/10 has better regs --> 5/10 is harder.
People who say 5/10 is easier than the 2.5/5 zoom say this because the fish/reg ratio is more (mainly because 5/10 games only run with a fish at the table) and these are players who's winrate is skewed because they are only sitting at 5/10 tables with a big fish on (unlike zoom where you may not play with a fish at the table for a number of hands).
Quote:
Originally Posted by pontylad
is that graph all 500 zoom? is less than 0.5vpps/hand the norm?
Nah, I played 4 zoom 500 tables and 4 zoom 200 tables all day. According to my HEM I get 0.63 VPPs per hand at 500 and 0.36 VPPs per hand at 200. (so when doing both at the same time it average out to 0.5 VPPs per hand roughly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky-PN
wow.. that must have felt gooood
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glanza_Mike
Nah he 8 tables now, 500/200
And Coop, stop at hand 1k imo
Lol! 10k hands a day is the absolute minimum for now... And if I'm down at that point, I'm not going to stop until I get a profit...!