care to comment why you 3b 87o to 12bb but only to 7bb with KK? both are on the button with virtually the same stack depth. i'm guessing it has to do with each villain's 4b frequencies and their dynamics with you, but please go into as much detail as you can
care to comment why you 3b 87o to 12bb but only to 7bb with KK? both are on the button with virtually the same stack depth. i'm guessing it has to do with each villain's 4b frequencies and their dynamics with you, but please go into as much detail as you can
I think it's pretty important to vary my sizing's all the time, both pre and post flop, and for value and some for not... Alot of factors contribute to my sizings, but yeah the bolded part are for sure some of the factors. In short though - One is alot weaker post flop, and the other the opposite. One 4bets a lot more, the other very rarely...
edit: actually didn't mean the 87o 3bet to be that much, maybe 10bb
Preflop: Hero is BTN with 7 J
Hero raises to $43, SB folds, BB raises to $160, Hero raises to $372.73, BB raises to $2,439.55 and is all-in, Hero calls $1,867.27 and is all-in
Flop: ($4,490) A 4 5 (2 players, 2 are all-in) Turn: ($4,490) 3 (2 players, 2 are all-in) River: ($4,490) 6 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Spoiler:
Results: $4,490 pot ($1.50 rake)
Final Board: A 4 5 3 6
Hero showed 7 J and won $4,488.50 ($2,248.50 net)
BB showed K A and lost (-$2,240 net)
At the time I was pretty happy with the 300bb fold. The more I think about it, the more I see him having like 99/TT and possibly AT/KT... And the more I play more hands with him I think it was a bad fold.
At the time I was pretty happy with the 300bb fold. The more I think about it, the more I see him having like 99/TT and possibly AT/KT... And the more I play more hands with him I think it was a bad fold.
were those two hands vs the same villain as in hand #2/15?
At the time I was pretty happy with the 300bb fold. The more I think about it, the more I see him having like 99/TT and possibly AT/KT... And the more I play more hands with him I think it was a bad fold.
What order did you play these hands in? As posted? Obviously only going on the 3 you've posted here but that guy seems aggro as fawk. He's hammered the river on fairly dry, or at least "readable", board that makes his hand range very defined, but that isn't to say he's doing the same on wetter boards like this one. Seems to play a very polarised game.
From the other hands posted he's obviously capable of running a big bluff. It's up to the rest of your reads on him to decide if his value shoving range includes two pair+, and whether he's a good enough thinking player to process that he knows that you know he's capable of huge bluffs with air. I think I actually prefer a fold given the fact that, like you said, you are very deep, so you have to be right a high % of the time. Obviously only have QQ, JJ or T9 beat you here but even against this defined range, I don't think the maths for a call work in your favour. I could be wrong?
For me a fold is the right play.
Sick hands,I tryed to pokerstove some stuff and according to that those calls seem really close,likely -EV,but who the f**k am I....GG,please keep posting HH's!
Nice work. Thanks for going to the effort of posting these. It makes great reading, I hope you keep it up.
Thanks and yeah will do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MastaAces
were those two hands vs the same villain as in hand #2/15?
Yeah
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang7
What order did you play these hands in? As posted? Obviously only going on the 3 you've posted here but that guy seems aggro as fawk. He's hammered the river on fairly dry, or at least "readable", board that makes his hand range very defined, but that isn't to say he's doing the same on wetter boards like this one. Seems to play a very polarised game.
From the other hands posted he's obviously capable of running a big bluff. It's up to the rest of your reads on him to decide if his value shoving range includes two pair+, and whether he's a good enough thinking player to process that he knows that you know he's capable of huge bluffs with air. I think I actually prefer a fold given the fact that, like you said, you are very deep, so you have to be right a high % of the time. Obviously only have QQ, JJ or T9 beat you here but even against this defined range, I don't think the maths for a call work in your favour. I could be wrong?
For me a fold is the right play.
The 88 fold was the day before the calls with J9ss and Q9dd. For sure he's very polarised, but he also plays the nuts very passively too sometimes. I have no clue how to run pokerstove with ranges and I'm actually near 100% sure he didn't have JJ/QQ so it's just 9T or the higher straight draws that missed. I think he had AT...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPE23
Hahah, this is great!
Quote:
Originally Posted by As1an1nvas1on
Coop is a feel player bro
You know it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by IveGotUrOuts
I also go every single time all in with table ninja lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS6R_MTM
Sick hands,I tryed to pokerstove some stuff and according to that those calls seem really close,likely -EV,but who the f**k am I....GG,please keep posting HH's!