Quote:
Originally Posted by Soyza
Idk why you give those guys even a reply it's an absolute waste of time. One of the guys doesn't even play for a living so his opinion is worthless. GL, i hope it turns around ADV, 6 card can be fkn brutal.
I know it's straight pointless, and one could argue hurting my reputation. But I spent my first like 20 years, like really spent, (over 40,000+ hours) in e-sports. Which has bred the immature/toxic guy you see before you. Part of my competitive side sees it pretty fun to dismantle their argument.
RektByPanda is a prime example. 19 year old, 25/50/100 PLO live crusher at Tampa, refuses to swap proof of even having $10-15K (that's 2 buy-ins for his self-proclaimed game), while we're DM'ing on discord trying to set up a HU. He basically said, "my cash is tied up atm, I need it for something coming up".
Finishing responding this entire post, took me like 20 minutes tbh. I know, I could've spent that doing more productive things. But tbf, I play lots of video games. This just replaces that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by onedollars
Sure, pros can typically go on larger downswings, but recs can go on longer, even indefinite, downswings because they have the "luxury" of being able to lose money in poker year after year whereas pros do not. This a pretty basic concept.
On the other hand, if you're so profitable, up heaps, and can afford the "luxury" of a 100k downswing, why can't you survive a standard downswing for those stakes without getting dropped by your backers and quitting the game you were in? And you refer to yourself as both a rakeback pro and a 10bb/100 crusher - which is it?
Lol at you issuing an unprovable bet as if an unhinged child like you has any credibility. And 10k is such a paltry sum for a big baller, did you forget a 0?
Some fun reading material for future visitors: https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...tries_to_kill/
Hey Old Man Dollar, I'll refer you to OMD from now on. Since you seem to be having early signs of mental decline. I'll break it down 4 u.
1. If the luxury you speak of is the novelty idea that you can keep losing because you have a job, well isn't that every other degen gambler in a casino? They have a job, to pay for their many years of poker. Good job. You're like the rest of the 2/5 NL pool, with enough income, to keep giving back to the casino, year after year. If you're trying to imply the idea that I cannot lose at poker, well let's put it this way. If I didn't play another hand of poker for the rest of my life, starting today, I'd be alright. So yeah, I do have that luxury?
2. You've been playing poker for 20 years, and never moved up stakes once. In fact, it seems like you dropped down stakes. Now don't get me wrong, I can respect any solid crusher, playing a lower stake, for easy income, auto-pilot no sweat. But that's not the case with you. In your own words, you're losing. And that's fine. You spent 20 YEARS, playing the same STAKE, if not lower, and still cannot beat it? You don't improve or something? That just shows the lack of ability at this point. Maybe it's your intellect. Maybe you're like a monkey, repeating the same thing, each time you hit the felt. Regardless if it's poker, a sport, knowledge, there should be progression.
3. I guess through no fault of your own, since you're not a poker pro, nor does it sound like you grind online. Most people that I'm aware of, include RAKEBACK in their WINRATES. Especially in HIGH RAKE ENVIRONMENTS like on GGPoker/APP-CLUBS. Rakeback is a huge part of the hourly. Like hello? This whole thread is proving that my RAKEBACK > my actual poker profits. So yes, I'm a rakeback pro, making over 10bb/100, net income, out the door.
4. It almost seems like you lack a logic train. I'm starting to think worst of you. Didn't think that's possible.
- One of my investors quit, and you want me to take up that equity % because I have a positive win rate. Clearly you have no understanding of 6c variance. Ever heard of BRM? Let me put it this way. I could lose $80,000+ in a REALLY REALLY bad day. Think about that for a second. And how many millions I'd need to comfortably sit. RE-TARD.
5. Why did one of my backer back off despite my positive win rate.
- I'm called
The Advantage Player for a reason. I structure my deals in the same fashion. Also, the same backer who backs me, backs two other pros I know. One is up $500K, the other is down $250K, both are known crushers. I mentioned these numbers in the past pages. He's probably reinvesting towards the guy who's up like $200K/mo and dropping the other two (myself included). Did I say, all my backers are dropping me?
6. As for why I asked for a $10,000 bet, I swear on my life. Originally I wrote $50,000 or $100,000 (cannot remember), but I felt like that was condescending. And you would never take up that bet. But if you would, okay bet me $50k that your poker income at 2/5 5/10 is higher than mine.
It's pretty easy. My rakeback alone, is more than 95% of a reasonable achievable win rate in live 2/5 5/10, even if I made you a superstar.
Going forward, at least don't make me repeat myself. If you want to entertain this longer.
Last edited by TheAdvantagePlayer; 05-28-2021 at 03:52 PM.