Quote:
Originally Posted by bbissick
Few insights on your hands
1.) Reg calling your 4b as the original raiser is really big alarm bells as it's almost always QQ+ here at min. Obv really can't mess up your hand with this much equity post-flop.
2.) **** board for you. I'm range checking here at 100bb's so I don't like it at 200bb's. Pro's of betting is you get some protection but we really don't want to build a big pot on a board where we don't even have an EV advantage.
If it's a rec who's wide/station than betting is fine/the play; dont like it vs regs
3.) I'm ok with calling or raising. Might lean towards raise vs the 60% sizing on flop, as played it's fine. River is mandatory call.
You're definitely making great progress so keep it up. Poker is a lot different with chess in the fact that I imagine you have to give up everything to be a GM and then it's no guarantee. It's definitely possible to get to the top in poker in a lot quicker timespan.
Also as far as the iggy pool. You might be able to win if you game select, but I think you're giving up a decent edge vs any solid/good regular atm IMO. I have no doubt you'lll get there soon though
Hey, thanks a lot for taking the time man. I’ll keep all of that in mind, read it a couple of times.
Would agree for sure about the edge I’m currently giving up compared to a good mid-stakes regular. Obviously, it can still be profitable despite that though!
———-
I like this recent mix of sessions where I mass table 200nl buying in for 100bb (with some higher and lower mixed in) mainly focusing on improvement/accumulating hands for review. Plus, I simply love playing.
And then others where I 1-3 table exclusively higher buying in for the max, with the main intention there being catching punts.
Have lost a few pretty soul-sucking pots recently, which feelsverybad given a higher stake and having 80-98% eq for pilesss, but wouldn’t do anything radically different in any hands and also the decisions to be in the games for those amounts, etc.
The jump in stack amounts has a lot to do with only buying in for 100bb during my normal grind. Few poasts on that earlier for anyone interested!
Nice to scoop that A
Q
hand in hand 1 though. Can be hard to pull the trigger in that spot. Can’t complain!
Quote:
Originally Posted by XtraScratch8
Was going to weigh in on the HH’s last night before bed, but decided I needed to get to bed ASAP after playing. Woke up to find that bbissick mostly said what I was going to regarding the hands, which feels pretty nice. Only thing I was thinking is that I’d be inclined to either bet flop smaller in HH1, or just x/jam even though we’re deep against almost any sizing. As bbissick said, you flopped so well that it’s hard to mess up that flop spot with that much $ piled in pre. I would just prefer to x/jam to potentially get some folds from QQ, which I think could reasonably happen. Agree this is QQ+ a ton, which means KK mostly given you’re removing half the QQ/AA combos. So even though x/jam likely gets called a lot and is what it looks like a lot, I still prefer to just stuff the money in right away when our equity is at its best and we max our fold equity generated. I think this is still okay at 200 bb in a rare spot like this. HH2 I would definitely range check that spot as well, even though TT feels most uncomfortable to check. If he’s a super wide fish it’s different as stated.
As for high stakes Iggy games, I don’t have a clue, but I think you’re on a good path just doing what you’re doing establishing yourself as hopefully one of the bigger winners in the 100-200nl Bros games. Plenty of money to be made there and set yourself up well moving forward. As you’ve said, it’s still early and building up a nice BR for the upcoming years can never be a bad thing. Personally, I feel like shot taking 5-10x your usual stakes can kind of mess up how you mentally approach your regular stake. I think you’re doing it just to experience it mostly, but it’s pretty easy to disillusion yourself when ya lose a couple BI’s at a way higher stake and undo tons of work from the past couple months.
Of course eventually it needs to happen though.
Edit: HH1 I actually don’t even hate the idea of betting stupid small (like 10%) and stuffing your stack in the times you get raised. Dunno if this is a thing or not. Almost anything works outside of fold basically.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts so eloquently sir. I appreciate the input!
Spaces next time though please
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2021shipit
This might be true, but I play 500z-200z and some reg tables on ignition and a lot of the regulars are genuinely terrible. At least for the stakes. Like I'll sit HU or 3 handed 500z/200z in the mornings and the guys will be 3xing and barreling / betting flops + turns they really shouldn't. He'll lose EV vs. a good reg, but beating fish + bad regs I think would make up for it. I'll post some LOL hands in my thread next month. Of course, That's only if he wants to move up stakes tho, might as well just play 200 on apps over bodog.
Thanks for the input & also the kind words earlier.
I’m not too knowledgeable wrt this stuff, but I can share my understanding.
I have done quite well to date (over a short sample), and I would still say PokerBros is the nut low for mid-stakes if you are an online reg—- given the rake+bbj, game security, software, setup, how much $ needs to be kept on the app to avoid transacting regularly, etc.
For those that only play live/haven’t grinded high volume online recently it could be different as obviously I’d imagine quality solver work/great fundamentals are extremely useful/borderline essential to thrive at mid-stakes off the apps.
What I’m looking at and starting to implement is a mix of 4-5 apps, and then a few sites (ignition, acr, global) as well. PokerBros would probably be my last recommendation as it stands today given game quality currently seems to be similar to ignition reg tables from my understanding + others experiences (in which case ignition is far more preferable for a plethora of reasons, some of which have been discussed at length)—- however full-time apps for any stakes is certainly manageable if you’re already fully set up, accustomed, etc. (ido)
All that being said, I’m pretty bad, just getting started, lots of work to do, no rush.
Focusing all of my efforts online since the start of the thread 10 months ago has been a fantastic decision because I would estimate I’ve made 5+ years worth of progress skill-wise all around (including mental game) in comparison to a live pro. Just a guess, could be wrong. A lot of that has nothing to do with me, and just how many hands you’re getting in per hour online.
———-
Please let me know what hands you want to see! 200nl or higher. I’m of the mind that the 200nl hands will likely provide the most value on average to everyone willing to engage.
In the spirit of transparency, yesterday seems to have been the worst day for me so far $ wise ever (-3.5k ish), however, still a solid month to date.
Have to keep up the workload. Far easier said than done of course, as it comes at the expense of everything else. But well worth it.
run good everyone
and thanks for reading! thoughts very welcome and appreciated