My history: Deposited $ 30 to Party last summer. Busted it fast to tournaments (lol) and did some reaserch and deposited $ 150 to Ladbrokes after doing a whole lot of research which I managed to grind at NL10 pretty fast. In that time, I read every possible poker book that I could find and used something like intellipoker starting hand sh*t for starting hands. Hey, NL10, raising JJ+ with 6*BB= 11 ptbb/100 hands.
Every time I had 18-20 buy-ins, I would raise my level as a test as I didn't see the idea of grinding micros any more than necessary. Money isn't good enough for any skilled player and the upper levels are easily beatable typically. All the gurus say that 20 buy-ins is good enough and I'm not making any serious profit so I might as well go for it. And I went. At worst I'm going to lose that $ 150. I typically spent like 1 hour after the session going trough hands and trying to understand the game as early as NL20.
In 3-4 months, I was sitting in NL50 with nice, safe roll but not going anywhere. I started reading several poker sites daily. I had huge difficulties with this level and I never managed to beat it clearly (like 1 ptbb/100 hands) and I never really moved down levels, I just didn't play it unless I had a good reason to do it (huge fish). However, I managed to build a roll playing NL20-NL50 mixed and due to the fact that I didn't take anything out via rakebacks (Lads rake is a killer but rb is 20 % - 30 % automatic).
I finally managed to take a shot at NL100 last december, which was more like NL20 than NL50. NL100 was the best level so far so I grinded it 3-4 months easily making 50-60 buy-ins total and taking taking it out. At this point I started already giving something back to some poker communities and blogging so my game would have goals, I could go over my hands with ease etc. I grinded bonuses at several sites at NL100 making pretty solid income with very low variance playstyle. During this time I learned a lot about table selection, position etc. constantly and reading my opponents (putting them on hand ranges, using timing tels etc.) + using the stats a lot by my own and TRYING to find stuff online.
Finally last spring/early summer I made my move at NL200/NL400 while I was earning easy $ 3000/month from NL100 playing semiprofessionally. This proved a lot difficult than NL100. I never really grinded NL200 level as I saw my roll being high enough for NL400 where there seem to be huge fishes, that I have played against before, spewing their money constantly (the table selection skills made me go for medium
). I just figured my roll is good enough and I could make some profit there. Also I'm not playing at Full Tilt or Stars so there wasn't enough full NL200 tables always.
Currently I'm making my move for NL1k where I'm grinding very profitably. I started there because I kept watching the tables for hours when other tables seemed dead at NL200/NL400. It seemed that many short stacks were spewing there their whole roll so of course I went for it. I won a little/lost a little and now I'm constantly watching those tables and playing them maybe 50-60 % of my time.
For the future, I will probably sit in NL1k tables until I have my roll for higher levels and I see the opportunity but I'm not going to start railing/stat-mining those tables for this year probably. I can't go play NL2k for couple of months since I'm underrolled.
I'm trying to play where it's most profitable so I'm not actually moving levels up or down. If the table seems very profitable and I have the roll to take the variance, I'm playing that table. Basically I'm just bringing new tables to my watchlist and getting rid of the lower ones. At the moment I might be grinding at 3 NL100, 1 NL200, 2 NL400 tables, which I have small, but profitable edge, while waiting for good NL1k tables on any night. I'm trying to get rid off NL100 since it seems I don't really care about the money on that levels even though sometimes it's the most profitable one. But basically if the tables are dry, I might be sitting in 12 NL100 just waiting and making pocket money (NL100=free candy moneys always). Typically it's mixed heavily NL200-NL400 being the average.
The sick part of my tactic is that typically my "shots" make me a huge winner on higher levels when my lower level grind is barely positive while I make these shots since I start to ignore the same table selection rules that I use on higher level and maybe not caring enough about the money. So while my profit and levels get higher, my lower level stats get worse and then I'll finally drop the level since I'm not intrested anymore.
Short answers:
What stakes did you start?
-NL10
How many hands/time did you need to move up to the next?
- about 2 months per level, beating every level, 20 buy-ins.
Were you a winner directly?
- Yes, NL50 barely. I have never lost a month.
Have you moved down and moved up again after a bad start/big downswong?
- I have never dropped levels, maybe mixed a little lower level back. I would drop levels if I had a big downswing but I'm a nit so I never have had bigger than 7-8 bin downswings.
Plan to move up soon?
- I think I try to stay as NL1k lurker for couple of months. That said, as soon as I have the roll (and a good opportunity (good, profitable NL2k table), I'm there.
Cliff-notes:
Semipro NL100 nit-grinder fooling around up to NL1k. Started with $ 150 last summer grinding NL10 going for any table which seems profitable if BR-management is in order. Reading absolutely everything about poker and analyzing hands for hours.
Last edited by Imaginary F(r)iend; 10-01-2008 at 05:41 PM.