Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulyJames200x
Is it agreed upon here that vegas is probably the worst place to play poker for 1/2 and 1/3 and 2/5nl because its infested with lot of 2/5nl pros?
I posted this from a vegas thread about quality of game and would like if anyone has input on it.
Is it true the games in vegas are very bad now compared to say 2012? Back then when i played there for a few months, i mostly played 1/3 at wynn and caesars. The games there were damn soft at caesars. Very rarely would there be say more than 2 players who i say are competent... if they were they were tight. The wynn i recalled had quite a number of regs at 2/5 i notice and some played 1/3 as well waiting for 2/5. The players at wynn were particularly stronger than anywhere else at 1/3... but again this was back in 2012.
Are the games in vegas pretty bad now even at say 1/2 and 1/3 now? I have to imagine 2/5 is probably mostly regs during the day and at night, its probably half regs? Of course it could be bad reg as well but any reg at the table isn't good for you. The thing is it seemed like most poker pros in vegas are 2/5 pros right? Since if you check bravo, seems like very few 5/10 games if any and if so, its max 1 table.
.
For what it's worth, I can give the viewpoint of a recreational player.
I play in New England. Was in Vegas in early September for only 2nd time. Only played 1/2. I ran bad but none the less, I found the play pretty bad.
I played at the Tropicana, Golden Nugget, Excalibur, Mandalay Bay, Planet Hollywood, and MGM.
The only Poker room that had, what seemed obvious, competent regulars was MHM and Mandalay.
Games were extremely loose and passive pre flop.
Lot's of limping and over limpimg. And, when people raised, they usually raised much smaller than what I'm used to. Like ridiculous amounts like 4,5, or 6. Passive post flop play, with a few exceptions, if course.
People calling down big river bets with 1 pair hands.
Long story short, I found the quality of play, overall pretty bad.