Quote:
Originally Posted by Nepeeme2008
A few questions. Hope this isn't too off topic.
I consider a "fish" as someone with little to no experience at the poker table.
As opposed to a fish, a " donkey " for me is someone with experience but who's still pretty bad.
Mind y'all, I don't actually use these terms about people when sitting at the table. Don't really find them that useful and I don't normally view people in derogatory terms. Anyways.
Would y'all agree to those interpretations?
And, what's a rec( recreational), and what's a reg(regular)?
How would y'all exactly define, differentiate those terms.
I mean, can a reg be a reg and not a pro?
Fish and donk are basically same. I'm more likely to think "donk" when I see some idiotic c/r with 2nd pair vs like x/c x/c x/c with the nuts but they're both terrible. Donks are those guys who look like TV tournament pros. Sunglasses, hat, hoodie, poker themed clothing. Often think they know what they're doing but are clueless. Donks are fish though. But not all fish are donks?
Rec = recreational player, usually a fish but not always. They just don't win a lot (usually) and their primary goal is recreation
Reg = regular, the people in the cardroom 25+ hours a week. Some regs are pros but others are slightly winning, break even, or slightly losing. A few are really bad but still play a ton for some reason. I use "regfish" for this player type. Solidly winning players at 2/5+ I just call pros though some are much better than otherd.
Probably about as good an answer as you'll get. Separating some of these terms is pretty subjective and arbitrary. It's more useful to focus on labels like maniac, LAG, TAG, LP, TP, nit, and especially to have specific reads on how they played previous hands.