[OFFICIAL] Winrates, bankrolls, and finances
View Poll Results: What is your Win Rate in terms of BB per Housr
Less than 0 (losing)
5
6.41%
0-2.5
0
0%
2.5-5
6
7.69%
5-7.5
8
10.26%
7.5-10
15
19.23%
10+
26
33.33%
Not enough sample size/I don't know
18
23.08%
07-03-2015
, 12:36 PM
I posted some statistics back in February from my $1/2 results.
Just about 3500 hours as a rec player, (other games filtered), over 7 years. The buy in cap and room dynamics varied. And I wasn't very good at the beginning.
Here's the figure that is the most relevant for these discussions:
The "trailing" numbers take the previous 100 or 500 hours and calculate a winrate only for that smaller subsample. So even as an overall winning player, you can go on runs where you're up or down +-$40/hr in a 100 hour window.
Results in that sample size range are just noise.
At 500 hours your start getting a better picture of your winrate over the recent game conditions. But a 500 hour up/down swing is only about 15,000 hands. Ask the online guys they'll tell you that sample sizes like that are still small. (Although, their edges are thinner so they need more data to determine trends than we should.)
07-04-2015
, 03:58 PM
Quote:
So very much this.
I posted some statistics back in February from my $1/2 results.
Just about 3500 hours as a rec player, (other games filtered), over 7 years. The buy in cap and room dynamics varied. And I wasn't very good at the beginning.
Here's the figure that is the most relevant for these discussions:
The "trailing" numbers take the previous 100 or 500 hours and calculate a winrate only for that smaller subsample. So even as an overall winning player, you can go on runs where you're up or down +-$40/hr in a 100 hour window.
Results in that sample size range are just noise.
At 500 hours your start getting a better picture of your winrate over the recent game conditions. But a 500 hour up/down swing is only about 15,000 hands. Ask the online guys they'll tell you that sample sizes like that are still small. (Although, their edges are thinner so they need more data to determine trends than we should.)
I posted some statistics back in February from my $1/2 results.
Just about 3500 hours as a rec player, (other games filtered), over 7 years. The buy in cap and room dynamics varied. And I wasn't very good at the beginning.
Here's the figure that is the most relevant for these discussions:
The "trailing" numbers take the previous 100 or 500 hours and calculate a winrate only for that smaller subsample. So even as an overall winning player, you can go on runs where you're up or down +-$40/hr in a 100 hour window.
Results in that sample size range are just noise.
At 500 hours your start getting a better picture of your winrate over the recent game conditions. But a 500 hour up/down swing is only about 15,000 hands. Ask the online guys they'll tell you that sample sizes like that are still small. (Although, their edges are thinner so they need more data to determine trends than we should.)
.I got another question about tournaments. I am currently playing an 100$ buyin tourney. Should I take rebuy in every case? Entry was 100 and rebuy costs 85$ and you get the same amount like on the starting of the tourney, is it +ev to rebuy?
07-04-2015
, 09:51 PM
Quote:
Thanks for the insight. I hope I will be lucky with variance at the beginning .
I got another question about tournaments. I am currently playing an 100$ buyin tourney. Should I take rebuy in every case? Entry was 100 and rebuy costs 85$ and you get the same amount like on the starting of the tourney, is it +ev to rebuy?
.I got another question about tournaments. I am currently playing an 100$ buyin tourney. Should I take rebuy in every case? Entry was 100 and rebuy costs 85$ and you get the same amount like on the starting of the tourney, is it +ev to rebuy?
07-04-2015
, 10:45 PM
07-05-2015
, 02:22 AM
07-05-2015
, 05:10 AM
07-05-2015
, 03:06 PM
07-06-2015
, 08:30 AM
Quote:
So very much this.
I posted some statistics back in February from my $1/2 results.
Just about 3500 hours as a rec player, (other games filtered), over 7 years. The buy in cap and room dynamics varied. And I wasn't very good at the beginning.
Here's the figure that is the most relevant for these discussions:
The "trailing" numbers take the previous 100 or 500 hours and calculate a winrate only for that smaller subsample. So even as an overall winning player, you can go on runs where you're up or down +-$40/hr in a 100 hour window.
Results in that sample size range are just noise.
At 500 hours your start getting a better picture of your winrate over the recent game conditions. But a 500 hour up/down swing is only about 15,000 hands. Ask the online guys they'll tell you that sample sizes like that are still small. (Although, their edges are thinner so they need more data to determine trends than we should.)
I posted some statistics back in February from my $1/2 results.
Just about 3500 hours as a rec player, (other games filtered), over 7 years. The buy in cap and room dynamics varied. And I wasn't very good at the beginning.
Here's the figure that is the most relevant for these discussions:
The "trailing" numbers take the previous 100 or 500 hours and calculate a winrate only for that smaller subsample. So even as an overall winning player, you can go on runs where you're up or down +-$40/hr in a 100 hour window.
Results in that sample size range are just noise.
At 500 hours your start getting a better picture of your winrate over the recent game conditions. But a 500 hour up/down swing is only about 15,000 hands. Ask the online guys they'll tell you that sample sizes like that are still small. (Although, their edges are thinner so they need more data to determine trends than we should.)
