really because I think it didn't miss the point and since I opened the post calling them both wrong I'm gonna say it's unlikely he will agree with anyone.


also it's funny to me how people are the first people to disagree with you but they never actually address your points, they just call them bad.

never change, internet.

You are entitled to your incorrect opinion.

Don't worry, be happy.

My first 50 hrs were >$100/hr. Then in one weekend it went down to about $50/hr. I think I'm remembering it that way. I honestly don't know how long it would have lasted. I had to quit playing right after that and haven't made it back up. I'm like 99% positive I'll be a big winner in the game just no idea how much. It's kind of frustrating to lose your entire bankroll on non poker related stuff and have to wait like a year to get back to better stakes.

Where I am from, we don't back down from arguments, not even really bad ones.

Was a pretty general comment, and even the targeted person agreed.

As pointed out, general comments are not always most accurate when we get to the specifics:

And I agree P4MS going deeper on my general comment, and apparently Mr. Haterade drinker did, too:

But then somehow...this came up out of nowhere:

So apparently my general statement was way off because happy guy says his experience is the opposite.

Then apparently it was all my fault even though I paraphrased venice (sorry to drag you into this):

Funniest thing is, Mr. Haterade/happy guy, conveniently ignored the part that I said that venice said...

Then of course, now opinions are also right or wrong:

So hey Mr. Happy guy, chill out?

Bad players are bad. If they tighten bad, they will over correct and fold too much. They don't go from calling to much to GTO optimal calling range; also at that point if the table is folding around you can manifest a lag image by widening in position, and they'll start calling too much in the wrong spots.

If you're a nit and people adjust to you and you still play as a nit, then yes your WR will drop a bit from the regs, but even then not much as your biggest pots as a nit come from the station and gamblers who frequent all poker rooms.

Put that on a T-Shirt.

OMG enough with the GTO. Do we need to resticky the COTM on this?

Rebound!

5.18 $260.00
5.45 $1,855.00
5.00 $300.00
5.43 $632.00
5.18 $1,940.00
5.55 $510.00
5.38 $825.00
5.65 $908.00
5.58 $425.00
5.10 ($203.00)
5.50 $865.00
5.52 ($1,100.00)
5.68 $1,220.00

damn you run good! 9 in a row is beautiful

The post about "hence" was hilarious.

im curious as to why you say that? this might be my burgerz but I can't tell if it's a compliment or not

I know this is sort of a hazy question:

How achievable is 15/hr at 1-3 100-300 7 max @ 10%?

Shouldn't be hard at all.

uncapped rake? sorry if this is obvious - what does the 10% mean?

10% rake at $7 max.

lol, I read that as 7 seat max, as if a unique underground game, knew I was tired.

agree with your answer, as most 1-3s just as soft as 1-2. would be toughest in rooms where many buy in short.

15 an hour is easily attainable

I would venture to say the double that is attainable. Not necessarily easy, but doable. $15.hr should be easily attained by any non terrible player.

I don't mean to git all ricky p on all y'all asses but ya its ez for maybe 2% of the playerpool in that game.

Doable yes - ez $ phuc no

2%?

Is that a serious number or are you just exaggerating?

Winning 5bb/hr in a room that caps at 2-1/3bb is probably close to top 2%.

That number is debatable, but at best top 5%.

Think about it yourself. How could he possibly validate that number? Anyway it really doesn't matter what percentage of the player pool does it as that wasn't your question. It has been attained before and it will be attained again.

That's way possible. Not easy though.

What would make it "not easy?"

Beating the players?

The rake?

Something else?