Quote:
Originally Posted by crackedpepper
Thanx for the answers so far, I appreciate them very much.
More Info about villain on that particular night: A drunken Aussie, playin spewy goaes all in with the the rest of his stack (60-80 $).
The TAG on the button calls.
Villain sits in BB, thinks and raises the caller to 150. Caller goes all in immediately, villains thinks again and calls. Makes him play for 360 $, about 2/3 of his stack. villains shows 99, the Button had QQ and won it.
I thought the call was little bit too light, but given the odds and resuming the button could have had an drawing hand I think the call was ok. Other opinions?
@discgolfing
I like your opinion. Still I think, because villain was raising constantly from HJ and CO, less from Button, calling with AJs is ok. But what can u do if villain barrels a ragged flop potsize and a call would mean basically commitment?
But 3 betting could give an advantage here.
Villain's mistake in the 1st hand is raising with 99 there. Standard TAG players aren't going to call a ~$70 shove with 88 or worse. Basically just hoping he had AK, and even then he's only a coin flip. He's crushed by anything else. The TAG made a good play there, probably smooth called the original raiser hoping for this exact scenario. Once villain makes that raise though, I still think a fold is correct but it's not a disastrous call with so much money in there.
If you're going to go with calling the AJs in those spots, I would prepare to jam certain types of ragged flops. 2
3:
:5
for example. You might have the best hand, and if you don't you have a gutshot/backdoor flush/at least 3 pair outs, probably 6. You can make the argument for doing this on some kind of QT/KT flop as well. I think this would be slightly better than just playing fit-or-fold post flop. But I still prefer 3betting or folding preflop.