Quote:
Originally Posted by wager9
Intersting spot. Thanks for posting.
IMO...the call pre is border line. I play these every now and again under very specific table dynamic scenarios - which is what it seems like you did here so I think your judgment of this is best.
On river...yeah its one fo two things:
1. Call which is a no-brainer +EV scenario
2. Make that thin value bet that separates the winning players from the really winning players.
This is a tough one too because there are a few things out there that can get disgusting. Stacks are deep. I really like a thin value bet here against a good opponent and perhaps a bet-fold if he is thinking player...but the problem here is that if Villain has fallen in love with a 3 and pushes or soemthing, it puts you in a very tough spot. And he may even bluff you with anything if he is that wild.
I think your hand is good but obvi not always. There is also a percentage chance you can get bluffed off the hand (even accidentally - e.g. if he is not bluffing but thinks his trips are good). This comes down to a read really on your part. You did mention he is a calling station if bet into. So this justifies a bet. But if you had more info on any reads off what this bet means it would help the casue a bit. Without any info on this bet, and the stacks being deep I would probably just call here. But if you think there is a good chance he will not re-bluff you (even accidentally) or have a better hand (based on reads/ tells/ etc) bet.
Great reply,
My brain was twisting around with thoughts just like your post. You touched on most my thought process.
In end, I decided he was to passive to raise with worse. Just smart enough to know what the nut hands where. And not capable of folding 2 pair, trips, small flushes.
So my decision was to raise/puke fold.
Last edited by mikko; 12-24-2014 at 04:34 PM.