Quote:
Originally Posted by matzah_ball
Pre should be a bit bigger but squeezing is obviously the correct play here.
Flop should be a bit smaller but betting is obviously the correct play here.
Don't see how anyone could argue otherwise honestly.
Given stack sizes, I don't like the squeeze at all.
The problem is that there's $20 in the pot, bet is $10, and we need to bet $40 to put V1 all-in. ...If stacks were $300, $40 would be a pretty normal raise size with a premium hand. If we raise to $60/75/90/whatever, we've made such an abnormally large raise that it screams "I just want to go heads up with this short stack, please!" That's not a bet that AK/AQ/AJ/JJ/1010/99 are going to fold to.
...If you really want to run a squeeze play with these stacks, I'd prefer min-raising to $20, expecting V1 to jam. V2 then has to choose between folding, calling the $40 with the betting still open, or raising with the mid-premiums in his range. If he calls, you can then raise another $100-$150 to take down his dead money.
On the flop, I'd prefer treating this as a protected pot. Potting the flop is going to force folds from some random, small clubs and non-club overcards. That protects our equity, but we're still taking a very vulnerable hand to showdown against V1's random holding. Depending on physical tells, I would either bet/fold $50 or check/evaluate.