Quote:
i can see how villain becomes more bluffable when we are deep. due to his playing style, though, his stack will often be close to 100bb.
on medium scary boards (3 cards to a flush or straight) he will still call/stack off. on (rare) scary-ass boards (4 cards to a flush or straight) he will fold to pressure.
I like the idea of stealing his blinds, I know you pointed out he raises the top ~2.5% of hands, but what does he flat with?
Even though he normally has 100bb, I think we might have to wait till he has at least 200bb before we should consider a large bluff line.
The fact that villain is raising PF to 3x, and "
on medium scary boards (3 cards to a flush or straight) he will still call/stack off" -- he is giving hero the odds to call his PFR light.
Why? It costs hero 3bb to call light PF, and villain will give hero 100bb every time he makes a flush, straight, ect.
So we can exploit this villain in a two easy ways:
- Probably steal his blinds/limps, and his limp/call/checks;
- Call his "small" PFR light and get paid.
To be clear, this isn't the same kind of nit I was talking about in my post. My nit would be folding his OPs on three tone boards, paired-boards, ect. -- thus making him much easier to bluff.
That being said, we can still probably bluff him when we are deep, if we play a meta-game correctly, which may include over-betting, ect.
I can image a few examples, but I'm reluctant to post them -- I don't want to be trolled by the “
I have a +WR w/o bluffing, thus bluffing is -EV” crowd.