Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudonym
I disagree with this analysis. If somebody makes an -EV move then it will make your original -EV move less -EV and in some cases could turn it into +EV. I can't think of a single situation where an opponent making an -EV move decreases your EV.
A very contrived example: You're playing heads up and you volunteer to put an extra $10 in the pot every hand if your opponent agrees to put in an extra $20. Obviously that's +EV for you.
In the OP situation I share the feeling that the triple straddle scenario is worth it but not the double straddle. I also agree that it will depend on stack sizes, we want to be shallow enough so that position isn't too great of a disadvantage.
Disclaimer is I only recently started playing in a game where restraddles were allowed.
That heads up scenario isn't a fair comparison because position has been eliminated from that scenario (alternating between the blind and the button)
As far as not being able to think of a scenario where an opponent making a -EV move decreases your EV:
You straddle UTG which is a -EV move. Then UTG+1 restraddles. The best player at the table is deep stacked and on the button.
The restraddle is putting more dead money into the pot making your original straddle more likely to be targeted by the good player in position.
You also lost your option to act last preflop.
That scenario, IMO, takes a -EV situation (UTG straddle) and makes it worse.