Quote:
Originally Posted by Javanewt
Again, those advocating betting flop, is it bet/fold or what? (I think only one person has addressed this, as bet/fold.)
I'm not expecting to get raised here very often on this flop. Reasonably, there are three 77 combos and three JJ combos. I guess you could add 2 KJs combos but $60 at 1/2 is pretty big, I'm not sure those stay in.
Anywho, none of those hands should be raising. Now that doesn't mean villain doesn't raise JJ here to "protect his hand" or whatever. But I expect it to flat most often.
That leaves AK as a raising hand (which is bad but we still see enough to include it in a flop raising range) and again if possible the QTs combos. I don't think QTs sees the flop, and if it does I don't think it raises here, but again man you never know, each session I play I see more random button clicking spew than the night before.
That's a long winded way of saying I don't expect to get raised otf often, and while it's always good to be thinking ahead, don't overthink ahead. If I did get raised it would depend on which villain, timing, and sizing. Probably at least calling flop.
The reason why this flop is a good cbet is bc top pair in unlikely to change and therefore villains continuing ranges will be fairly inelastic.
We can check 337r because we fear zero cards and villains can pick up hands otts.
We can check 89Thh bc villains have a big range advantage on us and our value is best extracted when our equity is more solidified (on a blank turn)
Don't check high broadway dry flops when we have an overpair in a 3b pot.