Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny_on_the_spot
We're you at the table? I wasn't. Do either of us know of V will or will not call a shove with a draw? No, we don't. Hero is the only person who has any real idea about that.
I said shoving was acceptable but I also said in the sentence right before that, which you just so happen to cut out of the quote, was that 3betting to 110+ is acceptable.
If you can't understand that there is more than 1 acceptable way to play this hand or that us as forum posters have really no idea what V will or will not fold to, then there is nothing more to talk about.
Sorry, did someone just run over your puppy?
Yeah I saw the previous sentence. I wasn't arguing with that, which is why I cut it out of the quote.
Sure there may be more than one acceptable way to play, but putting the idea of "Fold" in the villain's mind, when we're an 80% favorite against any reasonable range of holdings, doesn't seem like one of them.
If you're gonna give advice, even alternative advice, you should provide some sound poker reasoning.
Even without being at the table, would you expect villain to call off his stack to our 3-bet when we raise to 7x his raise on the flop? I don't think that's sound or reasonable.
I also think that narrowing villain's range to be even mostly 1 and 2 pair hands is also not sound nor reasonable. You'd be talking about less than 30 card combos, and more than half of those don't fit the pre-flop action.
So taking the least EV line against the biggest part of his range, does not sound like a reasonable alternative.
Sorry about your dog.