Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeStarr
That makes sense although I cant see how its a great situation for the house. Most rooms dont like it because the hand takes an extra 30 seconds or so costing them rake. How do they benefit from an extra $400-$500 being on the table when there's already $4000+ on the table and just about every hand is already max raked?
Keeps more tables running. Raking 28 hands an hr on three tables > raking 30/hr on two.
It's not one size fits all and how it's done matters but in general.
It's almost always bad for you, the winning pro. Fewer hands an hour. Fewer chips on the table. Neither good for a crusher's bottom line. In the short term/vacuum snyway.
