Quote:
Originally Posted by submersible
but it isn't because he had 88? you're making really really weird specific population assumptions and (too) large deviations as a result.
I take it this was directed at me?
Not sure what question you're asking me here.
There's an entire section of the forum dedicated to poker theory and GTO. I thought this section of the forum was specifically for discussion of exploitative adjustments for playing LNLHE cash games. The entire point would seem to be making deviations from GTO.
So...yeah, I plead guilty to making exploitative deviations from GTO. I do it for reasons I think are logical, based on experience, psychology, logic, whatever. I don't think the assumptions about older players are "really really weird" or all that specific.
They're actually the opposite - pretty common and very generalized, which is why I said in my first comment, "No other reads than older gent..."
If we play GTO, we'll still sometimes make decisions which were correct in theory, but which result in a loss. Likewise, when we play exploitatively, we'll sometimes be wrong, and fold QQ to 88 here.
I'm fine with that, for the reasons clearly stated - against this type of V, at low stakes, within this population, showing this sort of aggression, we'll see AA/KK and sets more often than worse 1P hands when they jam, even in low SPR situations.
I said I'd call 100% of the time with all my sets and AA, and often with KK/QQ, but that I might sometimes even fold KK/QQ. I noticed you said we should call with ANY pair. I don't think that's right. At this SPR, I'm pretty sure we're only supposed to be stacking off with top pair or better, not just any pair.
If I decide not to stack off with Tx or JJ here, against this V type, showing this sort of aggression, on a fairly dry board, that's actually not that big a deviation, and as exploits go, it seems fairly defensible.