Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
(Hope this makes sense....lot of tequila)
So this is a great post and it’s hard to argue with strategically. You’re right if we’’re playing vs a good player who is trying to outplay us
But tactically the vast majority of the people we’re playing at 100 and 200 nl online and up to 2/5 and often 5/10 live are playing their cards and not their ranges and rarely their opponents ranges .
So in this specific example, because we’re playing against people who rarely try to outplay us, call too much and bluff too little on early streets and then fold too much with marginal hands on turns and rivers when betting gets big. So we c bet this flop with that range and then fold to a raise, probably actually barrell the turn and rep an overpair and potentially actually bet/fold, give up or sometimes bluff shove river.
I think it’s more profitable to table change than to amend our 3 bet range when we’re playing wizards. I get that if you aspire to battle the best and be the bestest, this may seem cowardly but it works for me
ty man. All of that makes sense and by no means am I advocating being a station or getting into random leveling wars with unknown grinders you’ve barely played with.
But I do think it’s important to focus on building a good foundation via putting in the work rather than looking for shortcuts (b/f religiously), even at the micros. Of course, I’m not speaking from experience. But many of the legends seemed to approach it this way, from my understanding. How is one supposed to make proper exploits if they don’t know the correct line at equilibrium? It seems to me as if many rationalize the shortcuts they are taking.
But definitely agree. Would be interested to hear what others think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny_on_the_spot
Not trying to make you feel bad, or as FW said, rag on you. You’re only a picture of Tom Dwan to me. That’s it. Just as I’m sure I’m just a picture of Bruce Campbell to you (whether you know who BC is or not). What you do or do not do is inconsequential to my life, just as the same is true for me wrt you.
I just find it funny and ironic when you talk about how it’s lower EV for Galfond to do XYZ and you would never do that specifically because it’s lower EV for specifically earnings potential, yet from your intro into this thread you’ve basically come out of the gate with your a potential $ crusher in the career world but don’t want to do that because you’d rather do poker because you can make so much $, and that’s all you care about. And I like to point out funny and ironic things.
Serious question: why don’t you make a pgc thread? You seem to get tired of answering the same questions in here (which I don’t blame you), at least in there people could search your thread easier and it might cut down on some of the redundancy for questions asked to you. Look at 6bet me’s thread. There are enough people following that when a faq gets asked, most of the time 6bm doesn’t even have to respond because someone will quote the correct previous posts.
You misunderstood. I don’t want to get married, have kids etc not because I want to maximize my earnings potential but because I want to not only be the very best but stay there. Anything that detracts from that doesn’t make sense to me.
Never have I said this to be controversial, I’m just expressing how I genuinely feel.
I’m sure I’ve probably implied otherwise so I get it, but money isn’t everything to me. I just anticipate having a lot of it if/when I accomplish the goals I’ve set out for myself.
In regards to the PG&C, it’s something I’ll consider when I’m 21 and am dedicating myself to the grind full time. Right now, I’m studying significantly more than I’m playing which i think is the right way to go about it. I’ve shown an ability to apply my knowledge well in real time.
Also, I struggle with other people’s judgment of me. Especially since in my eyes they don’t understand me. I’ve never tried to make this thread my personal PG&C , just talk about myself a little more than I should. But I’ll do better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapidator
Nice how experience has a way of making up for a lack of skill and discipline.
explain please
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Spyutastic
One thing about Poker Bros I like is that they let you throw dookie at people's heads.
The RNG feels very similar to Ignition and Bet Online and ACR and Pokerstars and Full Tilt and live poker.
So I would say it's rigged because my aces keep getting cracked by J6o.
Am I the only one who can’t tell if you’re joking?
because this is what all the bad regs I’ve played with live sound like haha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by miamicheats
For the devils game - is the Jeff hwang book still relevant? I remember reading it years ago, but I’ve put in close to zero volume at plololol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would recommend a RIO membership. Some of the coaches are meh but Galfond himself has several solid PLO videos, specifically dedicated for essential members.