Quote:
Originally Posted by DooDooPoker
I think jamming turn is a massive overplay. A lot of these players won't bet draws OTT and will X back pairs so their turn stab becomes very strong.
I think betting turn will be better because if he raises it's an easy fold and you still get value from a lot of his hands. If he is passive then it actually get's a bit close when you X and he bets.
Him being a fish actually hurts you here since he has way more value than a normal reg would.
It is kind of gross how nitty you have to be when you play live in certain spots because online it's just a x/r jam ez game but live players are scared to bluff.
I agree check jam turn would be a massive overplay here. Any fish except the absolute worst drooler is capable of folding top pair to a massive jam like that.
The fact that hes passive and very wide preflop is also a negative in game in my mind because he has so much more value here when he bets vs a tighter player considering he is pretty passive overall.
I think this is a super close spot.
I agree with you on betting turn. As soon as the hand was over i was thinking I shouldve bet turn myself for like 100. Even though fish is pretty passive even he might find a bluff when i blast flop and then check turn on a board that heavily favors him.
I think bet turn for 100 and check river is a better play. I think fish is much less likely to bluff river vs turn bc they are heavily skewed to showdowns and happy to get there and check back w mid strength and weak hands rather than bluffing them.
I dont like my turn check.