It certainly "looks like" UTG aces vs. old guy kings vs. hero's queens. We know for certain my hand and old guy's hand. There really is no reason for the UTG guy to lie and say that he had us both beat pre-flop, although he never did show his hand. His super-tilting after the hand may have been more indicative of someone who should have won the entire hand. If UTG did have Aces, would he have just called my 4-bet re-raise to $50 pre-flop and simultaneously keeping two others (hero and the old guy) in the pot? Maybe UTG did this because of all the strength that was demonstrated and even more so because old guy had such a small stack and he wanted to keep my bigger stack in the pot.