Quote:
Originally Posted by Jkpoker10
I tend to bet half pot or more in majority of my Cbet pots whether it be a bluff or value unless I have the nuts..... if I have a nutted hand I tend to check and try to trap if opponent can’t catch up (ex k8 on a k88 flop.)
Any advice on Cbet sizing I should stick to like in this spot? I agree c betting here is very bad. I tend to c bet too much as I’m a former mtt player. I def need to work on what boards I Cbet etc. I’m kinda clueless as to when to check and when to Cbet my made hands. Thanks for input.
Sure.
In the case of this hand, after your 3 bet is called, there's 126 in the middle and 208 behind. So knowing this, why would you need to bet big with value? If you bet 40, there's less than a pot left.
So in this case, small bets still put us in a position to win his entire stack when we have it, while risking less when we missed with AQ or AJs no FD. So really, when we cbet, we'd like to do it as the smallest size possible where he won't just peel us with trash. I use approx 1/3rd pot for this.
From there we need to think of what hands benefit from a bet. If our range is TT+, AK, AQs-AJs, then it's clear what hands benefit the most:
AQs, AJs: generating folds from better
AK+: generating calls from worse
So we'd primarily want to be betting these hands, maybe check folding A hi misses sometimes and check raising top set or an A hi flush draw sometimes. But these will be primarily bets.
From there, we only have 18 more combos of QQ-TT. Given preflop, these are basically the same hand against his range. However, QQ is hurt far less by giving a free card than TT (the only overcard left for QQ is an A, while TT has to worry about an A, Q or J). Moreover, these hands don't have 3 street value: they have to be checked at some point or else we risk overplaying our hand, even at these stack depths. So why not check the flop to a certain point? And QQ is our best flop check candidate
Also think of it this way. There's 126+68 = 194 in the middle after you make this flop bet. If villain moves all in for 208, he turns a profit even before considering fold equity if you fold 208/(194+208) = 51.74% of the time. Now let's look at TT+/AK/AQs-AJs
You have a few clear calls if you bet your whole range in KK (3), AA (6), AK (12), A hi FD (2). That's 23 combos. You have a bunch of clear folds (6 other A hi's). If you bet fold QQ-TT, you're folding 51%. If villain has any semblance of equity, he can move in and own you if you're bet folding queens. So you need to construct your range to where he can't make exploitative jams constantly.
Also, the K high board in 3 bet pot, contrary to what people believe, is actually BAD for the PFR. Look at your range above: over half of your combos are weakened by this board. So this is a good spot to check, and check quite a bit. Like if you have KK, you have nothing to worry about besides the club draw and can induce bluffs, and still get a bet turn shove river in if he checks.
If stacks were deeper (like SPR of 5+), then cbetting more is good, since you need to in order to threaten his stack when you don't have it, or get his stack when you do. But at 1.65, it just takes two streets.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk