Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
so when comparing a "traditional job" to playing poker, I think you need to weigh a few factors:
i think your off on some of these so im going to chime in
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
* with a traditional job, you get a ton of additional benefits (health, dental, life insurance, retirement, 401k matching, social security, etc). That stuff probably adds up to $25+K in non-monetary compensation, above the salary.
refer to mike kelley's coments, also lol at social security being in there
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
* with a traditional job, assuming you're above average (which most of you are), you will most certainly make MORE EVERY YEAR, and get promotions every few years. with poker, you will "on average" make LESS every year. Poker is a zero-sum game (negative, if you factor in the rake that gets taken out of the system). I'm just guessing here, but I think for every person who successfully jumps from 2/4 to 5/10+, you get more than one 5/10+ guy who has to take a step down or just leave. I think this is structural because the growth in the number of weaker players at the higher stakes is way lower than the growth in numbers of good players. Obviously, if you're an elite player, this is less a factor.
this assumes two things:
1. While traditional jobs do get increases every year for the most part they dont stay that far above inflation (most typical yearly increases are between 2 and 4%)
2. That a poker player's yearly income stays the same or gets worse year in and year out which is definitely incorrect for people whom you consider will play 10 years+ in this game. I believe people who will play this game as their main source of income and make 6 figures will have well over 5% yearly increases in profits, granted there will be variance in this also, for example a they may make 100k for 3 years straight and jump to 150 in year 4 which totals 450k over 4 years while a 4% yearly increase at 100k would be 441,630.
One more thing to consider is that even if a players winrate doesnt increase yearly or if they stop moving up limits which if they are staying ahead of the game one of the two should be happening if you look how the limits of games have progressed in general over the last five years its amazing, I remember when 5/10 was the biggest game stars had I was 18 then but I remember it was the biggest and then they added 10/20 and then 25/50 and then tilt got nose bleeds and 200/400 was the biggest game and now its 500/1000. Im not saying well see 100k/200k as nose bleeds and that 100/200 will be the new mid stakes or anything outrageous like that but if you think about what games were middle stakes 4 or 5 years ago it wasnt 5/10 and 3/6 thats for damn sure. I mean i wouldnt be at all surprised if 5-10 years from now 10/20 was considered the new 3/6, it may seem crazy but ask anyone who has been around for 3-4 years or more online like too eazy and hell probably agree with me about the progression in stakes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
* with many "traditional" jobs, you will develop a skill set that is easier to transfer over to another job. for example, if you program with a software firm, ten years from now, you'll be looking at much higher profile job choices should you decide to switch in a similar industry. If you play poker and decide to go to work 10 years from now, you will be looking at the same choices in 10 years as you have now.
This is true in most cases so I wont argue it too much but think of all the cases you hear about now where CEOs and wall streets guys that got let go and cant get new jobs (granted the economy sucks right now but imo i think thats due to some variance also and believe something similar will happen again before I have passed on)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
* with a traditional job, there is less month to month volatility of earnings. You pretty much make the same amount every month. But with poker, you will have some break-even or down months interspersed with a lot of good months. Less volatility is always worth something.
If a player cant accept that fact that he makes x amount of dollars more per month then in the best regular job he could get and part of this higher salary is because he is forced to deal with the daily, weekly, and even monthly variance then he shouldnt be involved in this game professionally in the first place
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
So in a nutshell, if you're making $200K a year playing poker now, I'm not sure if that's that much better than making $75K at a "traditional job" (I'm just guessing here), because in about 10-15 years, you will probably be making the same with either choice, which means the "traditional" job will probably come out ahead. The main advantage of poker is that you can make a lot of up-front cash in case you want to do something with that money. Again, if you continue to get better over time and become an elite player, poker will be better. But there aren't that many elite players.
This is where i decided to make the post because this is so far off imo that I felt the need to make an objection. I cant name one job I know of that starts above 75k a year with a bachelors maybe engineers but all the tech, accounting, and finance guys I went to school with who have jobs started at 40-55k (of course no one i know went to Harvard, Yale, or MIT but neither are any of the guys your speaking to in this forum unless im mistaken. On top of that the % of people that end up making 200k a year in the long run is very small I dont believe that even 20% of the people that start at 50-75k end up making 200k a year (minus doctors or lawyers but again I dont think any of the guys reading this are in law or med school) because like poker you rise and fall based on performance meaning getting 2nd level promotion may seem easy but going from the bottom to the middle is much easier then going from the middle to the top (reminds me of poker tbh). I just think you throw out a figure like 200k like its happening for most college graduates when they are in their 40s and 50s but that is just not the case. Here's two articles where the top college median isnt over 150k during mid career.
http://www.payscale.com/best-college...statistics.asp
http://finance.yahoo.com/college-edu...du-collegeprep
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
I guess for an old fart like me who's looking to play like 10 years, the above are not as huge considerations as most of you guys, who are looking at something to do for the next 30+ years. Anyway, just wanted to give you a more balanced view, because it is a HUGE decision.
Who wants to be playing this game for the next 30 years? I think if 20% of the regs on this forum are still playing 10 years from now Ill be surprised what it comes down to is this, this game is a means to a end for pretty much every player I know (besides ptero cuz hes a sicko) I remember Nolan saying or writing somewhere that he would pursue poker for the foreseeable future until something more profitable came his way and I think thats what most of us are trying to do. 200k a yr maintained over 5 years is a million dollars if you take just 15% of that and use it towards another business or investment via real estate or stocks or whatever then you have a serious amount of money to start what ever side investments you would prefer, like for instance my game plan is to make enough money in poker to start real estate investment so I can become the next spex x or RikaKazak (if you dont know these names spend some time browsing the business, finance, and investing section of 2+2 and ull get what Im talking about). This is just my personal example but if you have 150K to invest in the opportunities will be there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
BTW, Sparky, doing 87.5% of something and not finishing is like wining and dining a 10/10, getting her back to your apt, starting to run the bases, moving over to the bed, getting undressed and insta-telling her to go home. :-)
This is spot on and sparky should seriously reconsider that decision. I mean its 3 months come on dude
Listen doublefly, i think you were just trying to help and had good intentions with your advice but GM definitely seems like hes right on the fence here and I just think your post made "regular" jobs sound way more appealing then poker for his future when I simply do not agree so I thought I would voice an objecting opinion because i think your advice is pretty much one sided. Feel free to let me know if my logic is incorrect at all.
Last edited by billzfan86; 08-02-2009 at 11:54 PM.