Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
Anyway, I've been reading some posts on 2+2 and posted this in the one where people were talking about poker getting tougher. I'd be interested to hear what you thought, esp since I'm only giving myself another year to decide what I want to do for the next 15.
I agree with your analogy. I think anyone who says the games are unbeatable or anything close to it, just isn't thinking.
If you take a look at the games of all the winning players in poker, you'd still see almost none that are playing optimally, in either an exploitative or an equilibrium sense.
The simple fact is that every player is still making huge mistakes, and probably not aware of many of them. I know from reviewing my own hands that I make mistakes
constantly, and those are just the ones I can detect. And yet I, and the rest of you, still manage to knock out a positive winrate.
It really comes down to something we all heard near the beginning of our poker careers:
"You don't have to be the best to win. You just have to play with players worse than you."
Now we've all taken this to heart (and oftentimes to a fault), and this is why certain tables can have waiting lists 10 deep within minutes, but there's another side to this advice. Namely:
"Your opponents don't have to be bad for you to win. You just have to be better."
As long as poker, or any other game exists, there will always be people who work harder, who focus more intently, who think more clearly. As long as you are making better decisions than your opponent, you will have an edge.
NLHE is a long way from solved.