Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleFly
NR, I have no idea what you are arguing about. Since you are familiar with the concept of risk of ruin, I'm pretty sure over half the regs ITT would not have been able to play the whole year at 2/4+ if they followed reasonable bankroll management with less than a 50 BI bankroll. When you play for a LIVING, do you really want your choice of games to be restricted in any way by your bankroll? And would you ever want more than a negligible risk of ruin? I mean you can disagree that 100+BIs is necessary, but you're never going to change my mind, and I think most people would disagree with you.
DFly, I can't make heads or tails of your post. You give no logical or mathematical basis for your position. I did. My point is that it is not EV-maximizing to play on a 100 BI roll, assuming you can beat stakes above those at which your roll is 100 BI.