Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack

10-29-2009 , 07:58 PM
I mean , cmon! cf? bf? AI? wtf.
Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG+1: $377.40
UTG+2: $197.65
MP1: $406
MP2: $714
CO: $180.10
BTN: $48
Hero (SB): $400
BB: $80
UTG: $76

Pre-Flop: K K dealt to Hero (SB)
2 folds, UTG+2 calls $4, MP1 raises to $18, 3 folds, Hero raises to $50, BB folds, UTG+2 calls $46, MP1 folds

Flop: ($122) Q 8 A (2 Players)
Hero ??
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 08:23 PM
1. Time down as if you are deep in thought
2. Bet $4 and hope villain already checked the "fold to any bet button"
3. ?????
4. Profit
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapow Dayok
1. Time down as if you are deep in thought
2. Bet $4 and hope villain already checked the "fold to any bet button"
3. ?????
4. Profit

I like combining 1 and 2!!!
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 09:00 PM
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 09:50 PM
No reads I am assuming? Bet half pot and folding to a raise, or check/calling the flop are the two main flop lines I would be considering.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 10:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rampage_Jackson
No reads I am assuming? Bet half pot and folding to a raise, or check/calling the flop are the two main flop lines I would be considering.
Problem is...if I bet half pot, he is raising for $75 more.....Pot will be about 340 by then...hardly seems right....

Check calling is the same problem.....

Just giving up seems ridiculous of this unknown called the 3 bet with TT or JJ..

I just dont see any way to get away from the hand. Is there? Should there?
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 10:58 PM
No reads at all? If Villain is even semi decent here, he wont have an Ace here. I mean what hand in his range, that contains an Ace here would limped and called a 4bet here?

I think KK here is still good. B/call for me.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by w00t77
No reads at all? If Villain is even semi decent here, he wont have an Ace here. I mean what hand in his range, that contains an Ace here would limped and called a 4bet here?

I think KK here is still good. B/call for me.
your reasoning has some merit, except that the fact that villain doesn't have Ax doesn't make it a bet. it just makes it not a fold.

c/c or crai depending on the sizing - crai only if his sizing is so big that he's virtually committed.

never fold for sure.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 11:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurt
your reasoning has some merit, except that the fact that villain doesn't have Ax doesn't make it a bet. it just makes it not a fold.

c/c or crai depending on the sizing - crai only if his sizing is so big that he's virtually committed.

never fold for sure.
Yup, agree with that, letting him hang himself repping the Ace is fine. As long the intention is not to fold.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-29-2009 , 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurt
your reasoning has some merit, except that the fact that villain doesn't have Ax doesn't make it a bet. it just makes it not a fold.
That is great though. A fold is good. So is a call from worse, which are the two things that can happen if he doesn't have Ax or better. There are certain players who are calling Qx against a c-bet, but not betting Qx themselves.

I think your point though is more why turn our hand into a bluff, when he might bet for us.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-30-2009 , 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rampage_Jackson
That is great though. A fold is good. So is a call from worse, which are the two things that can happen if he doesn't have Ax or better. There are certain players who are calling Qx against a c-bet, but not betting Qx themselves.

I think your point though is more why turn our hand into a bluff, when he might bet for us.
Because you aren't turning your hand into a bluff...you are protecting your hand from a suck out. Definitely ahead here. If he's any good he's not going to bluff when checked to either, knowing that repping the A isn't believable and betting Q is no good if he's got show down value...he's going to take a free card to suck out on you, and then you're going to be pissed when he hits a gutshot with 9Ts or two pair when the J comes on the turn.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
10-30-2009 , 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtgDerivBoy
Because you aren't turning your hand into a bluff...you are protecting your hand from a suck out. Definitely ahead here. If he's any good he's not going to bluff when checked to either, knowing that repping the A isn't believable and betting Q is no good if he's got show down value...he's going to take a free card to suck out on you, and then you're going to be pissed when he hits a gutshot with 9Ts or two pair when the J comes on the turn.
Based on villain's preflop play, can't we rule out pretty much everything other than AK or pocket pairs here? Maybe AQs if he is really really bad.

We are way ahead or way behind here. No real need to protect, so check the flop.

Yeah, the villain might hit a two outer on the turn, but it's a chance worth taking to give the villain a chance to bluff.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-02-2009 , 09:07 AM
Whet's his stats ? Afq? I think betting a flop when he's got like 140 or so is comitting and he's going to give you action only with the best hand.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-02-2009 , 10:13 AM
b/f or c/f
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-02-2009 , 10:16 AM
I think a cBet here is wrong. Nothing worse calling; nothing better folding; and no turn cards that scare your hand.

Any reads?
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-05-2009 , 06:12 PM
wow, personally I'd just chec/fold this but according to you guys, that's horrible.

I mean, like fish said, nothing worse (or at least very little) calls, so we gotta check. Is he gonna fire KQ or JJ or some random stuff that we have beat if we check? I doubt it. So the only choice is to c/f? Where's this wrong
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-06-2009 , 03:43 AM
i misread the stack depths, its just a c/f here
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-06-2009 , 10:18 AM
It's c/c. In semi-recent memory, I've snapped off a bluff from 77 in an almost identical spot. If anything, Villain is just as likely to shove nothing as he is to shove a better hand than yours, with which he'll often try to tarp.
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-06-2009 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
It's c/c. In semi-recent memory, I've snapped off a bluff from 77 in an almost identical spot. If anything, Villain is just as likely to shove nothing as he is to shove a better hand than yours, with which he'll often try to tarp.
+1

It's fun to read c/f posts
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote
11-06-2009 , 03:31 PM
c/c way better than any other option


i'd 3bet a half stack more here since they tend to have a narrower range from the getgo
NL 400...WTF spot with KK vs Random Half Stack Quote

      
m