Multiple decent players at the table in a low stakes game? I almost never see anybody play decent in these games. And these guys aren't going to be floating much. They will tend to play fit or fold on the flop.

And a lot of those players do not understand what TAG players do. They think TAG players are just nits, unless the TAG player is on a decent run of cards. Then they might think the TAG player is a decent player.

You are greatly overestimating the average low stakes plalyer. Those players play a certain way, stick to it, and often won't pay much attention to the rest of the table.

There is way too much of an emphasis here on avoiding variance and winning a high percentage of hands when you play. Cbetting a pot sized bet is too much. I find betting around half the pot to be effective, especially when my pf raise sizes are already bigger than the raises from anyone else at the table.

What do you do when you have pocket pairs and suited connectors? Do you try to win as close to 100% of pots as you can every time you have those hands? I know I don't. I don't even think that way at the table. So I wouldn't think the same way when I have JJ which is even better in multiway pots than lower pairs when I flop a set. And I disagree with your suggestion that JJ is bad in multiway pots. Even AQ is a great hand to have in multiway pots when it's suited.

It seems like you want to play the way you do because of fear. I don't think the style you describe I'd nearly as bad as the reasoning you're giving for playing that style.

If you really want to win every time you have AA, just shove with it every time you get it pf and you'll get fewer bad beats and win almost every time with it. But then you will be forcing your opponents to play correct more often and they will make fewer mistakes.

By "You don't see many players like this" I mean there are not many players in small stakes Vegas games where you need to make a strong effort to balance your play. Furthermore, "balancing your play" is much more important in online games where many villains are capable of datamining your history. If you don't balance there, you will be abused.
But most small stakes Vegas players don't really have a good idea of what we are doing. If a higher-stakes sits down for a few hands while waiting for his table, balancing makes no sense to me. Do we expect the villain to remember what we do the next time he sees us?
There are some regulars, however, who are strong enough to see our big-picture exploitive strategy and may be able to abuse us. In that case, we adapt.