Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Internet vs Live Internet vs Live

02-12-2011 , 12:45 AM
^^^ lol
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 01:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stampler
maybe i'm off, but is'nt the definition of a good player fairly simple?
:the one who gets the $, thats the good player.
No Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

Online Poker(BB)
Live Poker (BTN/SB)


Pre Flop: Online Poker is BB
Live Poker limps ldo, Online Poker checks

Flop: ($12.00) t K 4 (2 players)
Online Poker checks, Live Poker bets PHIL IVEY, Online Poker raises to DANIEL NEGREANU, Live poker calls




Turn: Q (2 players)
Online Poker bets PHIL HELLMUTH, Live Poker calls



River: 3 (2 players)
Online Poker bets JERRY YANG, Live Poker folds



Final Pot:



Online Poker wins
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 01:48 AM
Winning lotto players have us all crushed.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 02:05 AM
Instead of arguing over our differences we should unite and agree on something we all know. Cash players are better than donkament players.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 03:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyvjv13
Honestly, I have no idea why anyone disagrees with stampler at all. He's right, poker is all about money and there probably are a lot things that most of us do poorly at an actual live poker table that cost us money. There is indeed more to poker than bet sizing and timing. Maybe online there isn't but at an actual table there sure as hell are. And in the end, there's only one scorecard, and that is maney. Good post stampler. Plus your location and pic are awesome.

That being said...

Spoiler:
boom
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 05:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky1231
No Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

Online Poker(BB)
Live Poker (BTN/SB)


Pre Flop: Online Poker is BB
Live Poker limps ldo, Online Poker checks

Flop: ($12.00) t K 4 (2 players)
Online Poker checks, Live Poker bets PHIL IVEY, Online Poker raises to DANIEL NEGREANU, Live poker calls
There must be something wrong with this hand history.
Once you bet Phil Ivey, Daniel Negreanu is no raise.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 06:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphi


cool story bro
I'm not even sure why, but this made me laugh my ass off.

Apparently, the steps to beating live poker are:

1. Don't wear a hoodie.
2. Talk to people at the table.
3. Wait to get dealt the nuts.

That seems way too complicated. Online poker is clearly easier.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepizzlefosho
you guys are fighting an unwinnable battle on your opponents turf. might be best just to bow out gracefully.]
and what turf is that exactly??

certainly not the realm of reason and logic! that's for sure!

if you guys were on a debate squad,
how would you be faring with the
"that's stoopid, I did'nt read it all" arguments?
massive fail, IMO.
and, by the way, i never suggested that having a proper image is ALL you have to do to beat live poker. not even close.
point out where i said that.
it went from 'majority of skill', to being all and everything in your feeble little minds.
I was just trying to contribute something to a discussion.
was definatley over-reaching, tho,
what kind of intelligent discussion can you have w/ someone who's head is
so far up thier ass, they have little or no chance of ever pulling it out??
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stampler

maybe i'm off, but is'nt the definition of a good player fairly simple?
:the one who gets the FPPs, thats the good player.
.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 04:55 PM
stampler unaware that his posts ironically add more value to this thread than the meme's.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschool
stampler unaware.
hahahaha good one
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stampler
and what turf is that exactly??

certainly not the realm of reason and logic! that's for sure!

if you guys were on a debate squad,
how would you be faring with the
"that's stoopid, I did'nt read it all" arguments?
massive fail, IMO.
and, by the way, i never suggested that having a proper image is ALL you have to do to beat live poker. not even close.
point out where i said that.
it went from 'majority of skill', to being all and everything in your feeble little minds.
I was just trying to contribute something to a discussion.
was definatley over-reaching, tho,
what kind of intelligent discussion can you have w/ someone who's head is
so far up thier ass, they have little or no chance of ever pulling it out??
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 08:14 PM
lol nice
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 08:20 PM
Great pic for that, pizzle.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-12-2011 , 10:32 PM


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Internet vs Live Quote
02-13-2011 , 02:33 PM
on teh subject of earning action, this chat cracked me up today...


xdrew32x: let me see, you play 20 tables, no action
xdrew32x: a/q

Last edited by vinivici9586; 02-13-2011 at 02:33 PM. Reason: doyle doesn't play AQ
Internet vs Live Quote
02-13-2011 , 05:43 PM
have you guys even thought about what motivates your opponents, ever?
or do you just assume that they have the same motivations as you?

actually, have you even thought about YOUR OWN motivations??
Internet vs Live Quote
02-13-2011 , 08:16 PM


I stample corrected.

Last edited by stampler; 02-13-2011 at 08:23 PM.
Internet vs Live Quote
02-19-2011 , 06:08 PM
Is this the thread that just keeping giving?
Internet vs Live Quote
02-25-2011 , 05:43 AM
we need ot make a thread dissing mtt pros next.

im pretty sure all the negative "internet kids" these live guys stereotyp are like 98% random online mtt "pros"
Internet vs Live Quote
02-25-2011 , 06:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by too eazy
we need ot make a thread dissing mtt pros next.

im pretty sure all the negative "internet kids" these live guys stereotyp are like 98% random online mtt "pros"
+1 seriously if they're wearing a hoodie/sunglasses/headphones at 5/10+ they're probably either a live player or an mtt player and let's face it most mtt pros aren't poker players at all they're just bustos who were able to convince someone to back them.
Internet vs Live Quote
04-08-2011 , 05:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinivici9586
stampler, you bring up some excellent points, but fail to realize that there are no fpps live. without rakeback, 95 percent of posters itt would not be making money. we occasionally play live (for entertainment purposes only), but without this necessary life-raft, we are unable to turn a profit, and instead resort to staying home and grinding our lives away making 600/hr
Live poker has two forms of rakeback. The first is the $2 per hour they give you in cash credit. The second is in paper comps that the floor issues for regulars. At the Wynn this can be three meals per day and unlimited free drinks. Additionally they will call you for good games and lock seats for you/move you up the waiting list for good games.

If you eat two meals per day at the casino the comps are worth $80 to $120 per day. The "table selection service" is worth much more than that. Rake is $12 to $14 per hour at the high-stakes tables, so if you play 8 hours per day that is 100%+ rakeback.
Internet vs Live Quote
04-08-2011 , 06:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
It's such a stoopid topic to argue. In live games at the stakes I assume Stampler plays, namely 1/2-2/5, setting up your image to get the nuts payed off is probably the most profitable skill, simply because so many bad players will "be tricked." In higher stakes and most online games, this is not the case so it doesn't apply.
Setting up an image in live poker is not terribly important. Most of the people playing recreationally don't know enough about poker to care about your "image" because they are only thinking about their own hand.

The skills Stampler is talking about are important, and he is correct in comparing poker players to salesmen. Part of the game (sales or poker) is being a friendly person who is pleasant to interact with. If everyone is dead silent and acting like a robot, it is a less pleasant environment for the retired CEO and he will pick up and leave. If everyone is jovial and he is enjoying himself, he will reload. The skill is in being friendly; the CEO will not care if you are a giant nit, he won't be able to tell if you are playing 48% or 18% of your hands.
Internet vs Live Quote
04-08-2011 , 06:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
+1 seriously if they're wearing a hoodie/sunglasses/headphones at 5/10+ they're probably either a live player or an mtt player and let's face it most mtt pros aren't poker players at all they're just bustos who were able to convince someone to back them.
QFT.
Internet vs Live Quote
04-08-2011 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyric
Setting up an image in live poker is not terribly important. Most of the people playing recreationally don't know enough about poker to care about your "image" because they are only thinking about their own hand.
I don't think you could be more wrong about this. No offense.

Coming from someone who has played live and online for about 5 years straight, I think that image in live poker is a huge consideration. Sure, people just play their own hands in medium to big pots, but there are so many other spots that your image helps you/hurts you.

A tight image can literally allow you to get away with murder in a live game, and a loose one will see you getting stacks in against really weak hands. In a live game, I feel like the effects of image are raised to a large degree. I can't tell you how many times people have made HUGE assumptions about someones play after only a half hour of play, which is a round 15-18 hands. "That guy is so tight" "That guy plays every hand!""
Internet vs Live Quote

      
m