Quote:
Originally Posted by illiterat
I think I understand what you are trying to say, but I think this will be confusing to a lot of people.
65s is not a better hand than QJs.
Maybe in certain spots 65s intersects with ranges in a better way, and is more deceptive ... but robots certainly prefer QJs over 65s and you should have very good reasons for not doing so as well.
Yeah, my post wasn't entirely accurate. QJs is generally better in unopened pots and as a 3bet. However, facing a 3bet 65s is often better when at least 100bb deep. QJs tends to be a 0 EV mix of call fold while 65s tends to be a pure call with low EV, even though 65s when opened is sometimes 0 EV - a mix between open raise and open fold. I really QJs is a better hand, but against the uncapped ranges generally 65s is better.
65s is definitely better than 98s though.