That's a good adjustment. I need to emphasize again that I hate the word default. There shouldn't be a default really in live play. Every spot is different and you have time to adjust and play optimally. Don't build a system. Those work well in online where the volume and pace are such that you don't have time to dig through a HUD for just the right play. Live, you do. Be dynamic.

:grunch:

I wouldn't bother trying to compare pokerpro tables to "standard" live tables. I expect that seeing more hands in a short time will tighten most players' ranges, which'll make the game play a little more like an online game where you can expect a lower winrate.

How do you know what the other regs are profiting? Are they into the game for $400 when they cash out for $600?

Your ranges look fine. Could cold-call a little wider in multiway spots.

You should tailor your your c-betting value/bluffing range based on who you're up against. Some V's are much more likely to float you or call light, so obviously don't bluff those guys, value bet them larger instead.

Regardless, a 100 hour sample doesn't really tell you much about your game. I just ran some statistics on my records in the bankroll thread, and a 100 hour sample will have an insane amount of uncertainty in winrate.

That's roughly 4000 hands. Break your results on Stars down into blocks of 4000 hands, and see what the winrate is for each block. Variance over that small a sample is huge; it's affected dramatically by the results of a few ginormous pots.

Discussions about hands are going to be a lot more beneficial than trying to extract meaning from results. E.g., I'm guessing you've plugged a leak since posting that recent KK hand.

Never open limp any hand from any position.

Good luck improving your win rate picking up blinds and straddles.

Learn to play postflop and you'll be fine.

Did I miss something? Is this FR on starz in 2009?