Quote:
Originally Posted by SNGplayer24
yeh id 3b flop
3B on flop sets Hero up for a shove against most of villains range which hero may not be able to call even though he's still probably ahead of most of villains range.
Hand 0: 39.575% 39.52% 00.06% 17996 26.50 { 32o }
Hand 1: 60.425% 60.37% 00.06% 27491 26.50 { 33-22, Ad5d, Ad4d, Ad3d, 6d5d, 5d4d }
Hero is ahead of 5 of 7 hands but still well behind range. At best hero has neutral equity and is well behind vs a shove. Raising does get some weaker draws to fold but I think it's a minority of V2s range. Since V1 call is likely FD, I think you can discount weaker draws from V2s range.
3 results of 3B on flop:
-winning a moderate pot probably vs small % of villains range.
-losing a large pot with 3B/F
-committing 160 BBs when behind range
clearly -EV overall.
V2 is clearly on a draw or better hand. In the case of villain having a set, all-in on flop is same result as call/call. By calling flop, villains range loses a lot of equity on a blank turn but hero saves a lot if d hits. He also picks up equity from V1.
Comparing call vs 3B scenario on turn:
If d hits turn:
-Hero loses a small pot he could have protected on the flop.
-Hero saves 120 BBs vs monster draw
-Hero saves 120 BBs vs set.
If a Blank hits turn:
-Hero equity doubles vs weak draws
-Hero equity doubles vs big draws
-Hero is still saving money vs a set.
-Hero has picked up equity from V1 call.
If Villain hits str8 or 2 pair.
-Those draws results in same since they would need to be part of combo draws that never fold flop.
Clearly in much much better shape with call vs 3B on flop for
any card on turn.