Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain

03-08-2011 , 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGAF
Someone please explain why he has to raise flop bigger, in position with top 2 and a solid image. Thanks.
to setup a river shove
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-08-2011 , 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrw8419
to setup a river shove
Against what hand?
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-09-2011 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFizzbin
Could also be KQ hearts...
feels like KhQh would donk with the intention of 3betting if raised on the flop, no?
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGAF
Someone please explain why he has to raise flop bigger, in position with top 2 and a solid image. Thanks.
Villain isn't donking with the intention of folding to a raise with any part of his range, and we're always ahead? Making it 240 here has no change on the outcome but nets us extra value for the rest of the hand.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-10-2011 , 01:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Effen
Villain isn't donking with the intention of folding to a raise with any part of his range, and we're always ahead? Making it 240 here has no change on the outcome but nets us extra value for the rest of the hand.
It takes all the bluffs out of a solid player's range. And you are giving villain too much credit imo.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-14-2011 , 04:40 PM
People simply don't bluff raise rivers in live poker, and the 1 in 100 that do can exploit me all days as I simply refuse to pay off river reraises out of live players- I'm over it


Ez fold

Fwiw I like turn play..
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-14-2011 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MintBerryCrunch
New to online poker forums, so forgive me for stepping in fresh and picking this apart. I hope people do the same for me.

This is an interesting situation. But I think you're asking the wrong question. Instead of "what should I do?", you should be asking "how did I get into this mess?"
And more importantly, "how do I avoid it In the future?"

His lead on the flop shouldn't be an issue here. You raised it and he called. The fun starts on the turn.

Look at the board on the turn. Why did you bet? Were you scared of a flush draw? Where you trying to get value for your top two? Were you prepared for a check raise there? Would you fold? At that point, you would have put in 1/5 of your money and folded. But still, you can get away from two pair.

Now look at the board on the river. You got a check call on that turn. Now what hand is going to call your turn bet, with all the leverage of your remaining $2,000 behind it, AND also call your river bet? It's hard to contrive a hand on this board that you beat and will allow him to call you on three streets to the tune of half your stack.

Maybe you should have checked either the river or the turn, depending on the feel of the game and whatnot.

I don't think you should worry about the check raise on the river as something to be expected, but rather ask yourself what are the likely outcomes of that river bet. Perhaps sometimes you will get called by a weak ace or looked up by a KJ. Mostly, after the turn call, you will get folds. And then there is the check raise....and you see the problem with that.
turn check would be atrocious.

flop sizing is okay, could be more though. 250-270 works good too b/c raise looks strong regardless so just pot it. Anything less than what you raised would be bad.

line is fine, on river b/f > c/c > b/c > c/f
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-16-2011 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyvjv13
turn check would be atrocious.

flop sizing is okay, could be more though. 250-270 works good too b/c raise looks strong regardless so just pot it. Anything less than what you raised would be bad.

line is fine, on river b/f > c/c > b/c > c/f
Well hero is IP so hard to c/c or c/f but other than that agree with this 100%. God people saying to check turn or river tilting the **** out of me both really easy vbets.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-17-2011 , 09:32 AM
looks like he got there
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-18-2011 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever Nickname
I think your line through the river is fine, river call depends on whether or not villain is dumb enough to checkraise worse two pair for value on this river I think.
most rational response in this entire thread

Last edited by jlocdog; 03-18-2011 at 04:01 PM. Reason: don't insult
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-23-2011 , 12:27 AM
I look at it like this: we are repping an absolute monster, the villain knows this and STILL check raises the river. This would make it a fold. A tough fold tho.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-25-2011 , 06:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyvjv13
turn check would be atrocious.

flop sizing is okay, could be more though. 250-270 works good too b/c raise looks strong regardless so just pot it. Anything less than what you raised would be bad.

line is fine, on river b/f > c/c > b/c > c/f
You really think it's fine to put half your stack into a pot and then decide to fold? I don't play too many hands where I feel like my hand is good enough to commit half my chips, but not good enough to commit my whole stack.

It's generally a good idea to have a solid reason for building a big pot. Otherwise, pot control should come into play. That means checking a street.

Feeling strong enough to bet three streets and get half our money in should lead to happily committing the rest of it.

No top cash game player consistently gets himself this deep into a pot and then slams on the brakes when his opponent sets him all in.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-25-2011 , 06:08 PM
Each decision should be made independently based on probability and odds. The people who make the most money in poker do this/they don't always adhere to the general rules that are in place to protect/guide those who cannot process a bunch of information and think about it critically.

If you never put half your stack in and then fold you are either missing a ton of value or stacking off unnecessarily light. Imo.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-26-2011 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGAF
Each decision should be made independently based on probability and odds. The people who make the most money in poker do this/they don't always adhere to the general rules that are in place to protect/guide those who cannot process a bunch of information and think about it critically.

If you never put half your stack in and then fold you are either missing a ton of value or stacking off unnecessarily light. Imo.
This, MBC your post is something you would tell a 1/2 guy first starting out with live poker just to avoid the common pitfalls because he doesn't really use his brain too much when he plays. For a 5/10 player though your logic is just soooo backwards you should decide to bet a certain amount based on the profitability of the bet. If it leads to something that will be unprofitable that's one thing but you're saying you don't do something that is clearly the most profitable play for the sake of having to do something you don't want to without even discussing how profitable it is? It's just horrendous logic although I guess that's why 5/10 live is still so soft because there are countless people with that mentality still.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-31-2011 , 12:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGAF
Each decision should be made independently based on probability and odds. The people who make the most money in poker do this/they don't always adhere to the general rules that are in place to protect/guide those who cannot process a bunch of information and think about it critically.

If you never put half your stack in and then fold you are either missing a ton of value or stacking off unnecessarily light. Imo.
I did't say never.

I wrote "I don't play too many hands..." and "don't consistently."

Meaning, the idea that checking a street here is a terrible play is incorrect. This is a text book situation for winning a mid sized pot.

I'll reiterate what I posted in my first response...there aren't enough hands we can beat that will call the turn bet and the river bet on this board.

And I agree with you about one dimensional thinking in poker. I've seen a lot of it recently coming from aggressive players and I've noticed that many of them have no concept of checking any turn when there is any kind of draw on the board, as if heads up they are always against a draw. They never play pot control and they never de-leverage. Hence, a turn check from them is always either a nothing hand or the unbeatable nuts.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-31-2011 , 07:31 PM
If you don't take my post personal, you might get something pretty valuable out of it (maybe not). I certainly didn't write it to make you feel bad/put you on the defense. Either way, go Dodgers opening day 2011!
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-31-2011 , 10:08 PM
Black and orange.

Last edited by chilidog0425; 03-31-2011 at 10:09 PM. Reason: I could have gone to the game today if I wasn't an ijit.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote
03-31-2011 , 10:42 PM
I'm here kershaw outclassed tim just need over now.
Gettin 3:1 on the river with top 2 facing a cooky line from villain Quote

      
m