This is not the right place for this, you should post such things here:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/19...-3-1-a-416381/
3 sessions is a small sample size, and your style of play works well against one-dimensional nits. However, taking it to 10/25 is a great way to spew away a bankroll. You see what Dwan does, but you cannot possibly understand why he chooses his lines in his particular spots. He can read hands impeccably well, and knows how to represent certain hands against weak ranges with great accuracy, making his bluffs +EV. His play is alluring, but to call it the clear-cut best is more of what you wish to believe, not the reality of what makes a winning cash game player in the high stakes environment.
If you take a line against a thinking 10/25 that is a bluff that makes no sense, you will get called. If you try to unknowingly bluff one of the "spots" in the game, you will get called. If you fail to merge spots where you are bluffing large amounts of chips with thin value for a sense of balance, you will get called.
I am not trying to be condescending, I am simply trying to explain why you should continue to gain a greater understanding as a poker player as opposed to shot-take at a level that is out of your league resulting in you dropping the game altogether.
For the record, I regularly play 10/25 when it runs at FW.