Quote:
Originally Posted by Frontline1980
Patchohare, yes, that's what I did. I based my decision on his range, but mostly with my live read. I see that basing my decisions on live reads is a less than common trend on most of these hand history threads. It makes sense that my own poker logic is different than most members, being that I've never read a poker book, rarely watch poker, have mostly live experience, don't have any serious winning poker friends to discuss poker with, and up until I recently joined this site, I never studied any poker concepts other than my own.
I joined this site to improve my knowledge, and I definitely have, now I want to make sure I apply the concepts correctly without going away from my strengths (which is my live read, knowing where I'm at more times than not). I've been successful to this point by playing this way, but I want to advance my game and move up to bigger games.
Maybe I should start a new thread with this topic.
good stuff. I myself give more credence to live reads than most posters in this forum. Being able to "read" people and understand game flow, betting patterns, mannerisms etc, is absolutely a skill to have. I don't think it's one that easy developed either, you either understand people or you don't.
If this is a natural strength of yours, I in no way would try to discourage you from using or applying it.
The point of my post was to shed light on the fact that based on the range you gave, you were behind only 2 combos, one of which would make the rare quad Kings(running no less). Other posts seemed to say this was a trivial/easy/no brainer fold otr. I would take strong exception to that line of thinking w/o being at the table and actually seeing villain oozing herculean strength or something of the sorts. I wasn't knocking your action (making the correct fold) as much as I was questioning the rational that led to the decision.
We have to at least mention the fact that putting villains on the only combo that beats us and folding as opposed to playing against their entire range would often be a mistake. Anyway, nice read and good luck.
Last edited by patchohare; 10-26-2013 at 11:29 AM.
Reason: never mind