I think our hand looks better than it actually is. If V has two overs and a diamond draw our equity is horrendous
Quote:
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
990 games 0.000 secs 198,000 games/sec
Board: 8d 6d 2d
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 08.687% 08.69% 00.00% 86 0.00 { 5d4d }
Hand 1: 91.313% 91.31% 00.00% 904 0.00 { Ad9d }
but, if V has a set, we're actually ahead on the flop
Quote:
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
990 games 0.000 secs 198,000 games/sec
Board: 8d 6d 2d
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 67.576% 67.58% 00.00% 669 0.00 { 5d4d }
Hand 1: 32.424% 32.42% 00.00% 321 0.00 { 6h6s }
---
hmmmm.... maybe we should call???
Well, if we merge the two ranges, 50% sets, 50% FD with overs...
putting them both together we end up with...
Quote:
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
1,980 games 0.000 secs 396,000 games/sec
Board: 8d 6d 2d
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.131% 38.13% 00.00% 755 0.00 { 5d4d }
Hand 1: 61.869% 61.87% 00.00% 1225 0.00 { 6h6s, Ad9d }
---
Well, if we have 38% equity we need 1.63:1 on our money.
So, pot is $677, there is about $420 behind so that gives us 1.61:1 on our money
Guess its right on the line if we assume V has a set or FD in equal proportions but V should have more combos of FD than sets....
But, if you can put overpairs in V's range then I guess you can call here...
hmmmm..... I guess you can make the case that we can call, though to me it feels like a bit of a stretch. .
Last edited by dgiharris; 05-21-2012 at 03:30 AM.