Quote:
Originally Posted by BadlyBeaten
^ NOT this!!!!
^ This!!
Because of this:
LLSNL players have patterns that they adhere to when they play. They will step outside those patterns occasionally because they know that they can't do things the same way every time. However, the patterns are there, and they can be observed and learned and exploited. And that's mostly where consistent long-term profits arise.
The deviations from the patterns are only occasional, because the patterns provide them with comfort.
When I see OPs (in general) give us reads on players or what players perceive them as and then the hand in question basically contradicts all of that information, I tend to disregard it because either OP is looking for a specific answer or OP just isn't very good at making reads
This hand OP says that V1 is ABC and views hero as a spewy lag. So obv V1 turns the nuts and decides to donk pot into a spewy lag?!? ABC play is typically to x/r turn with the nuts and vs a spewy lag people also like to x/r a lot.
So my default is to just ignore what OPs reads are because something isn't correct in them and look at the hand.
Given that we lose to
JJ (3)
77 (3)
89s (4)
10 combos
We beat
AA-QQ (18)
Let's call it's 1/4 that because it's not standard but is in the realm of possibility, so 4.5
I don't have an equity calc in front of me, but that's roughly 36% equity from my back of hand math. We only need 33% to call. This is not including anything more in Vs range like a weirdly played AJ or AXhh, all of which make this more of at least a call. Call vs shove is whatever