Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Did this just happen? Did this just happen?

11-18-2013 , 11:27 AM
2/5 NLHE, $570 effective.

Villain has been at the table for about 45 minutes and appears pretty loose. Clearly recreational and not familiar with any poker decorum (keeps his big chips in the back and has no idea what a straddle is). I am fairly certain (he almost had to have) he overplayed an Ax on an AA6r flop in a 3bet pot where I cbet and he check-shoved AI. I folded, so didn't see for sure. He has also overbet the pot a couple times w/o showing it down.

Villain in SB.
Hero in BB.

Folds to Villain who completes. This is the first chance we've had to chop, and I offer even after he completes. He looks confused and says nothing. I look down to XX and raise to $20. He calls.

Flop is 9d8d3c. He checks, I bet $25 and he moves in for $550 total. He appears comfortable and clearly he thinks he has the best hand.

What is the minimum you call with here?
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 11:29 AM
So you're asking us to play blind?

It makes a big difference, but given you don't want us knowing your hand minimum of top set to call.

This is probably going to be locked.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 11:33 AM
If I feel like gamboling, AdXd. Otherwise, I'd have to have a set or 10Jdd or 67dd.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trucdouf
So you're asking us to play blind?

It makes a big difference, but given you don't want us knowing your hand minimum of top set to call.
You are folding 88 here?
How about 33?

You're folding JT?

It's all about range analysis. We don't need to know our hand to make an educated guess on the range of hands that he could have. Once we determine that we should be able to peg down all the hands that we would call with.

I'd prolly call with any set, any straight draw + flush draw combination, I'd be on the fence with AA, top two, and possible AFace
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iraisetoomuch
You are folding 88 here?
How about 33?

You're folding JT?

It's all about range analysis. We don't need to know our hand to make an educated guess on the range of hands that he could have. Once we determine that we should be able to peg down all the hands that we would call with.

I'd prolly call with any set, any straight draw + flush draw combination, I'd be on the fence with AA, top two, and possible AFace
All of that is read, table, and hand dependent. Because I would play all of those hands differently rather than blanket raise 20 everytime SB completes.

So given none of this, I can't promote any hand but top set to call.

(Given our PF raise and cbet that got an AI, I'm folding draws et al. I don't like OPs line: felt like a steal, looked like a steal, got caught off by an AI, and he wants me to play blindfolded? FistPumpFold.)
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:01 PM
Bet $525 to win $610?

He has AA/KK min and sees the str and flush draws out there .. What do you have?

If he's that new to live poker then ask him if he wants to run it twice and watch the reaction. Did you teach him a lesson by calling? GL
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trucdouf
So you're asking us to play blind?

It makes a big difference, but given you don't want us knowing your hand minimum of top set to call.

This is probably going to be locked.
Wow you give terrible advice
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:20 PM
TT+, A9, most gutter + FDs.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:24 PM
99-88-33-J10d-A3d
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:24 PM
2 pair+sets+bog combo draws.

i dont think i would call AKdd here.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:29 PM
given villains description as being a recreational player/noobish and prob overplaying WA/WB spots with marginal holdings and being shove happy overall, it looks like the player type who tries to "end it right here" and "not let you draw for free", all these oldskool thinkings coming into play here, i think his range is massively weighted towards made hands and not draws.
i wouldn´t put it behind a guy like him to show up with a weirdly played overpair here, so i think it´s getting close with hands like QQ+, although these being close folds imo. our hand actually matters in terms whether we block some of his hands or not, but given my read that it´s mostly a made hand, and being it a horrendous overshove, probably not a real marginal but quite a good made hand, i´d say minimum of 93+
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwslim69
Wow you give terrible advice
That's what God and the sweet baby Jesus put me here for.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berge20
2/5 NLHE, $570 effective.

Villain has been at the table for about 45 minutes and appears pretty loose. Clearly recreational and not familiar with any poker decorum (keeps his big chips in the back and has no idea what a straddle is). I am fairly certain (he almost had to have) he overplayed an Ax on an AA6r flop in a 3bet pot where I cbet and he check-shoved AI. I folded, so didn't see for sure. He has also overbet the pot a couple times w/o showing it down.

Villain in SB.
Hero in BB.

Folds to Villain who completes. This is the first chance we've had to chop, and I offer even after he completes. He looks confused and says nothing. I look down to XX and raise to $20. He calls.

Flop is 9d8d3c. He checks, I bet $25 and he moves in for $550 total. He appears comfortable and clearly he thinks he has the best hand.

What is the minimum you call with here?
probably KK+. AKdd probably, too. JTdd, t7dd, and 76dd are also calls.

FWIW I spend a minute chatting with him to see how comfortable he is.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel9861
TT+, A9, most gutter + FDs.
We don't have equity to be calling gutter+FD against even T9
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 01:26 PM
99/88/33 maybe 98 depending on my week. I hate hate hate getting this many BB in pre against a guy who is just temporarily holding my chips with a hand that's less than 75% favorite.

I'd take drawing hands out of his range, I think you are playing against 1010+ up to 99. Ideal play would be to stove it with whatever range you think and call any +EV situation. I'm not a fan of getting money in at LLNL with small +EV big risk situations though.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 01:28 PM
33, 88, 99 ... maybe 98 .... And I guess if I can call with 98 that means I probably have to be calling with like JJ+, maybe TT, A9... Effff... I hate this spot a ton.

In the heat of the moment I probably call with sets only. Good for you is you are capable of some kind of sick bluff like that.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunChips
99/88/33 maybe 98 depending on my week. I hate hate hate getting this many BB in pre against a guy who is just temporarily holding my chips with a hand that's less than 75% favorite.

I'd take drawing hands out of his range, I think you are playing against 1010+ up to 99. Ideal play would be to stove it with whatever range you think and call any +EV situation. I'm not a fan of getting money in at LLNL with small +EV big risk situations though.
This. It might be slightly +EV to call with AA here, but at some point I'd rather have a big edge when big money goes in. This is one of those times where I prefer to have a bigger edge and thus my calling range is tighter.

Last edited by AcePlayerDeluxe; 11-18-2013 at 01:52 PM.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcePlayerDeluxe
33, 88, 99 ... maybe 98 .... And I guess if I can call with 98 that means I probably have to be calling with like JJ+, maybe TT, A9... Effff... I hate this spot a ton.

In the heat of the moment I probably call with sets only. Good for you is you are capable of some kind of sick bluff like that.
Huge diff between holding JJ and 98 vs the described villain. If he range is mostly pairs (which, IMO, it is), there's a lot of AA-QQ in range for V here.

Plus 98 blocks his set combos down by a lot, making the call outright trivial.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 02:21 PM
Maybe we should do some actual maths here...we need like 45% or so to call

If V range is A9, TT+, 89 and sets we are crushing him with a range of

JT, QT, QJ, AK, 99, 88, 98, and 33

ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
1,078,110 trials (Exhaustive)
board: 983
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
JdTd, QdTd, QdJd, AdKd, 99, 88, 98, 3370.03% 737,05935,883
A9, TT-AA, 89, 33, 88, 9929.97% 305,16835,883

You want to remove A9...ok guess what we are still crushing

ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
879,120 trials (Exhaustive)
board: 983
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
JdTd, QdTd, QdJd, AdKd, 99, 88, 98, 3366.91% 570,41935,523
TT-AA, 89, 33, 88, 9933.09% 273,17835,523

OK now let's remove the spazz factor (which is absurd for a fishy noob) and just focus on his strongest value range we are slightly less than a flip with $90 dead

ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
249,480 trials (Exhaustive)
board: 983
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
JdTd, QdTd, QdJd, AdKd, 99, 88, 98, 3346.92% 99,42835,280
89, 33, 88, 9953.08% 114,77235,280
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 02:23 PM
Jesus I'm rusty at this. Can I take back my post? Lol.

Given player description and what we know about him he probably overplays overpairs and I assume he would do this with 2 pair+. Throw in a couple of combos of A9 and strong flush draws since there's some non-zero % chance of those then I think the bottom of our range is KK+ and OESD + FD.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 02:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwslim69
Maybe we should do some actual maths here...we need like 45% or so to call

If V range is A9, TT+, 89 and sets we are crushing him with a range of

JT, QT, QJ, AK, 99, 88, 98, and 33

ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
1,078,110 trials (Exhaustive)
board: 983
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
JdTd, QdTd, QdJd, AdKd, 99, 88, 98, 3370.03% 737,05935,883
A9, TT-AA, 89, 33, 88, 9929.97% 305,16835,883

You want to remove A9...ok guess what we are still crushing

ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
879,120 trials (Exhaustive)
board: 983
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
JdTd, QdTd, QdJd, AdKd, 99, 88, 98, 3366.91% 570,41935,523
TT-AA, 89, 33, 88, 9933.09% 273,17835,523

OK now let's remove the spazz factor (which is absurd for a fishy noob) and just focus on his strongest value range we are slightly less than a flip with $90 dead

ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
249,480 trials (Exhaustive)
board: 983
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
JdTd, QdTd, QdJd, AdKd, 99, 88, 98, 3346.92% 99,42835,280
89, 33, 88, 9953.08% 114,77235,280
The problem is we don't have a range, we have 2 cards, and all that matters is how those two cards stack up versus his range.

It's a much better exercise to run Villain's range versus us holding:

AKdd
76dd
ATdd
QTdd
98
TT
AA

as examples of spots we may or may not want to call.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 02:45 PM
^^True enough...
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berge20
2/5 NLHE, $570 effective.

Villain has been at the table for about 45 minutes and appears pretty loose. Clearly recreational and not familiar with any poker decorum (keeps his big chips in the back and has no idea what a straddle is). I am fairly certain (he almost had to have) he overplayed an Ax on an AA6r flop in a 3bet pot where I cbet and he check-shoved AI. I folded, so didn't see for sure. He has also overbet the pot a couple times w/o showing it down.

Villain in SB.
Hero in BB.

Folds to Villain who completes. This is the first chance we've had to chop, and I offer even after he completes. He looks confused and says nothing. I look down to XX and raise to $20. He calls.

Flop is 9d8d3c. He checks, I bet $25 and he moves in for $550 total. He appears comfortable and clearly he thinks he has the best hand.

What is the minimum you call with here?
I would consider calling with top two pair and better
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 03:00 PM
Maybe I'm very suck at this game, but I don't give V credit for KK/AA and probably QQ until he proves me wrong. If I do I better have a pretty good tell such as V hesitated like he was going to raise before he completes in the SB or V is breathing heavy, etc. otherwise, ya, I'm not giving him much credit for those hands.
Did this just happen? Quote
11-18-2013 , 11:25 PM
Didn't mean to annoy/confuse with the unknown hand, but thought it might be a better discussion without.

Actually had the two black tens in this spot. Chose to fold, but didn't really like it.
Did this just happen? Quote

      
m